Qercus front cover and VantageBy Chris Williams. Published: 12th May 2004, 17:41:12 | Permalink | Printable
There's always an explanationMedia watch Before today's promising news of the release of a new version of Vantage broke, we contacted Qercus to ask why the latest issue of their monthly magazine featured a front cover designed in Vantage and an inside article on using it, which might have been seen as a tad insensitive given that many of Vantage's users had been locked out of the graphics software. Qercus editor John Cartmell replied soon after, justifying his editorial decision, which he asked to be reproduced in full - insightful as it is, so here's John's response:
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 23:06:10 +0100
From: Qercus editor
To: Chris Williams
I've been asking for a 'Vantage' designed cover for some time in order to break up the preponderance of ArtWorks/PhotoDesk covers. I've also asked for Draw, Vector, ProArtisan etc. produced covers. Your contribution is welcome! (and you may wish to tell your readers that we pay for the original artwork for our covers). At best I'd like to see each month's cover over a year each produced using a different application. It so happened that a Vantage cover happened along in time for issue 270 - and we always try to include a description of how the cover was produced as we consider our cover art to be an integral part of the magazine rather than a mere decorative front-end. In the future I'd like to see an even greater diversity of images - eg in some issues it may include images produced mathematically by programs analysed in StarInfo.
The illustration in issue 270 could equally well have been produced by the next release but one of ArtWorks (Martin has just put back the release of graded transparency) and I will draw attention to the possibility at the time that issue of ArtWorks is released.
You may note that we included a description of how to cope with the 'flaky' Vantage 1.01 (with no protection problems) back in volume 9 issue 5 (p36). Perhaps you would like to draw attention to the fact? [ The issue is still available from us on its own or as part of the bundle* comprising the whole of Volume 9 of Acorn Publisher].
We consider that it's important to give readers/customers the tools to use the products they have as well as (behind the scenes) push for improvements - or in this case for things to be put right. Whilst users have been wrongly excluded from the software they have purchased the action taken by Cerilica is hardly irrational. It was a thoroughly rational response to piracy - but one that doesn't work in changed circumstances that no one envisaged. It is a decision that needs to be changed and should have been changed some time ago.
And I certainly won't withdraw our support for owners of software just because their support from the developer has disappeared!
*20 GBP inc UK post (+4.20 Eur; +9.60 World) or for 5 GBP less when purchased at the same time as a 12 months subscription to Qercus.
Previous: Grapevine 2 supports ICQ
Next: Vantage relieved of copy protection system
DiscussionViewing threaded comments | View comments unthreaded, listed by date | Skip to the end
Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.
Search the archives
Today's featured article
Using SDL natively
Neil White makes his move
2 comments, latest by nex on 17/10/04 10:52AM. Published: 6 Oct 2004
What should be the platform's priority for 2009?
Give those in charge of this ship a direction to aim for in the new year.
10 comments, latest by Stoppers on 17/1/09 6:36PM. Published: 28 Dec 2008
News and media:
RISCOS Ltd •
RISC OS Open •
MW Software •
Advantage Six •
CJE Micros •
Liquid Silicon •
Chris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collection •
The Register •
The Inquirer •
Apple Insider •
BBC News •
Sky News •
Google News •