South East 2007 show preview | Drobe.co.uk archives

South East 2007 show preview

Published: 18th Oct 2007, 18:13:54 | Permalink | Printable

What to expect at this weekend's event

The RISC OS South East show, taking place this Saturday in Guildford, Surrey, will see a number of new products unveiled - from databases to graphics. Here's a round up of what you can expect to see revealed this weekend.

Headlining the event are R-Comp, CJE Micros and Icon Technology with their new releases. R-Comp will have on sale copies of DataPower 3, CJE Micros have an upgrade for PhotoDesk prepared, and Icon will launch a new version of TechWriter and EasiWriter.

On top of this, VirtualAcorn will be demonstrating a new beta version of their RiscPC emulator for Apple Macs.

VA's Aaron Timbrell told us: "Beta3 of VRPCAdjustSA for the Mac will be making its first appearance. We've done another round of improvements based on the feedback from users of Beta2.

"We've also been tweaking the Intel processor cores to solve a couple of niggles and to optimise them for the Apple architecture."

Steve Revill from RISC OS Open and Jack Lillingston from Castle will give a theatre talk on their shared-source project and the Iyonix computer. ROOL also hope to release various core components of RISC OS 5 on the day of the show.

RISC OS Ltd will have a stand at the show although no new release of RISC OS 6 or RISC OS Select is expected to be unveiled. ROL may have something ready in time for the Christmas show, it's believed.

ROL's Paul Middleton spoke to punters at a usergroup this week, where he brought with him some new bits of RISC OS Select, a Viewfinder-powered RiscPC and an Apple G5 Mac running VirtualRiscPC.

An eyewitness said: "Paul suggested there won't be a Select 4i3 out for the South East show, but there might be one for the Christmas shows.

"He demonstrated some new or newish bits of Select, which were loaded over the top of a S4i2 softload. One of which was the Filer with keyboard navigation, which he demonstrated at Guildford two years ago. There was also monitor auto-detection stuff, so you don't always need a MDF file, but he didn't show the Filer with the toolbar he demonstrateded in 2005."

Our man in the south London curry house added: "Paul wasn't able to confirm whether or not RISC OS Select will be released as a softload over RISC OS 5.

"He also claimed that there would never be another native RISC OS hardware platform, as the market conditions that created the Iyonix and A9 won't happen again. These conditions being a large RISC OS-using customer requiring it, who will fund development of the hardware. In the case of Iyonix, Paul mentioned that the particular customer was Nokia - albeit very quietly."

Paul is due to give a show theatre presentation at the event.

RISC OS Now editor Louie Smith confirmed she will be exhibiting at the show, and said progress reports of her magazine will be posted on the publication's website. Readers have waited months for a new issue of the bi-monthly magazine to arrive as Louie ran into problems generating PostScript output for mass-printing with RISC OS. However, it's hoped a breakthrough in processing the PostScript files in order to make them suitable for professional printers will get the publication back on track.

RISC OS Now webmaster Paul Vigay said: "I'm optimistic that Louie's temporary problems have been solved and that future issues will be back on track.

"I'm liaising directly with the printer at the moment, and I'm pleased to say that RISC OS is now being used 100% from start to finish - although it did involve writing some PostScript pre-processing software for RISC OS.

"However, now that this application is complete and working, there is no problem in getting Louie's OvationPro files into a format compatible with the final printer."

Paul added he will be demonstrating his RISC OS shareware and running a special offer for people who sign up for broadband with his Orpheus ISP.

He said: "I've got a brand new version of WebGallery, which has quite a few amendments and bug fixes in it, so people can come and have a nose at that. I'll also see if I can stock up on interesting sweeties too, as I seem to recall people kept popping by the stand to nick a toffee or sherbet last time."

CD cover

MathMagical, run by Drobe contributor Martin Hansen, will be selling CDs of mathematically generated artwork. Its cover is pictured left. The CD will feature a slideshow of 217 computer calculated and plotted pictures, 65 of which are new and never seen before. Martin has also tidied up the user interfaces of his RISC OS software and added Drawfile export support to his Sudoku game.

He said: "Everyone I've shown the CD of images to thinks it's fab. Sadly, perhaps, it's also a move towards something that I can sell to Windows and Apple users too."

Alligata Media's David Bradforth, who will be giving the other theatre presentation with Qercus, will be offering a special four-issue subscription to eBay Advisor magazine. He'll also have copies of RISCdomain, BASIC V: A dabhand guide, Essential OpenOffice.org and more on sale.

Other exhibitors at the event include APDL, Electronic Font Foundation, the ARM Club, MW Software, the NetSurf team, Archive magazine, and the charity stand. Jim Nagel and Paul Beverley, of Archive, will also give a theatre presentation. The event was organised by the Surrey and Sussex Acorn User Group with the help of Fillin Ltd.

If you're going to the show, feel free to drop us an email afterwards with any news you've heard or pictures taken. A full report show should follow after the event.

Links

The South East show website - doors open from 10am to 4pm on Saturday October 20 2007. Entry costs a fiver.

Previous: New Datapower 3 for South East show
Next: New PhotoDesk upgrade revealed

Discussion

Viewing threaded comments | View comments unthreaded, listed by date | Skip to the end

"He also claimed that there would never be another native RISC OS hardware platform, "

But we could well see RISCOS on ARM hardware given the number of devices with ARM chips in them.

markee174 on 18/10/07 7:21PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

"He also claimed that there would never be another native RISC OS hardware platform ... "

Without wishing to seem unnecessarily pessimistic this would seem to explain the lack of Select for the Iyonix. The ROL's business plan appears to be focussed on the past - ie the large pool of RiscPC and A?000 machines out there.

In comparison the number of Iyonix is too small for them and with a belief that no new machines will eventuate they are looking backwards rather than forward.

I hope that I'm wrong!

rmac on 19/10/07 4:54AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

I disagree with the statement that ROL are looking backwards but I do wonder what the strategy is (or if they actually have one).

Once upon a time ROL looked at RISC OS on Netbook, a project that never eventuated for many reasons. Since then a huge amount of work has been done to make RISC OS more portable buy abstracting hardware dependences. They also have a much better understanding of what is required now than they did back in the RON days.

As I see it the only real options for ROL are: - continue to sell to the shrinking RISC PC / A7000 user base - produce versions for the A9home (easier) and then Iyonix (harder) - hope people continue to buy emulators - target ARM hardware from other manufactures

The major issue with the last option is that they need to pick a device that will stay in production long enough for them to port RISC OS to the hardware and will appeal to people who are likely to buy one so they can run RISC OS on it. Obviously this costs money and is probably quite risky.

It looks like ROL have put many of the things in place that are required to run RISC OS on other hardware but resourcing, slow development, finding appropriate hardware and alternative operating systems are obstacles that ROL must deal with.

stevek on 19/10/07 7:16AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

ROL have provided a means to a future that gives space to partners (at present known or unknown). I don't know who might take up those options but they are the only ones available for our area of interest. It was necessary for ROL to be inclusive (old hardware & virtual) and a pity Castle/Iyonix haven't made it easy for their product to be included too. I'd be surprised if the comment from Paul wasn't taken out of context though.

jc on 19/10/07 12:00PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

stevek:

> I disagree with the statement that ROL are looking backwards but I do wonder what the strategy is (or if they actually have one).

Someone asked what the 'wishlist' for Select was for the next year. Paul stated that everyone at ROL had their own ideas, but he wanted to concentrate on fixing bugs that have been present in RISC OS for ages (You know, the ones nobody notices).

In follow up to the questions about possible new ARM hardware, Paul said that he considered an emulator running on a minimal Linux distribution was his ideal solution. Where Linux can handle dealing with all the various devices (graphics, audio, network etc.) and the emulator would then just access them via common Linux APIs.

Leo on 19/10/07 12:34PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

leo: Paul is obviously considering the success of the VA on Windows when he talks about his ideal solution being on a basic Linux foundation - and there is a lot of sense in that. My very strong preference is for RISC OS on ARM - though a solution that included Linux somewhere along the line might (at some point in the future) solve a number of problems. Developing an OS for all hardware developers is critical though.

jc on 19/10/07 12:44PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Beta3 of VRPC for the Mac? Damn this post strike! I can't go to the show tomorrow, so I'll just have to wait for the post strike to end before I can have my copy.

A new release of Techwriter is always welcome as well.

cables on 19/10/07 12:49PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Will the guys from Advantage6 be there to talk about the A9home? And about when flash 3 will arrive? Or should ROL have something to say on this? Is there a theatre slot for them?

CKH2 on 19/10/07 3:05PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

jc:

> Paul is obviously considering the success of the VA on Windows when he talks about his ideal solution being on a basic Linux foundation - and there is a lot of sense in that.

I'm sure he is, and of course that's probably his personal opinion and not necessarily ROL's official position. The bonus of someone producing an Emulator for Linux is that it opens up another market for ROL to sell RO Select to, without them having to do any work...

> Developing an OS for all hardware developers is critical though.

It may be, but its not what ROL is doing (Paul stated that its just not cost effective to produce a version of Select for the Iyonix). Maybe ROOL will have better success at fulfilling this critical task?

Leo on 19/10/07 3:09PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

CKH2: Going by the show website and what I've been told, Ad6 will not be present. I assume CJE will be the people to speak to about Flash3; Chris Evans mentioned its progress on the A9home list (quoted on drobe).

diomus on 19/10/07 3:13PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

In reply to diomus: Shame Adv6 won't be there and their web site (experienced user support) is just never updated. Good news is that the guarantee period for my A9home hasn't started yet and doesn't start until it's upgraded to the retail spec. - overall therefore quite a cheap (i.e. zero cost) form of extended guarantee...

CKH2 on 19/10/07 3:27PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

jc: "I'd be surprised if the comment from Paul wasn't taken out of context though."

Almost impossible - Paul talked about it at length, clarified it in response to questions, and re-iterated (part of) it after the meeting ended.

(I'm not the eyewitness quoted in the article, though, I didn't have time to email anything. Someone else was taking notes for Archive).

dgs

dgs on 19/10/07 11:18PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

As for "Paul suggested there won't be a Select 4i3 out for the South East show, but there might be one for the Christmas shows" ... well well, I didn't expect any new Select anyhow since I assume(d) that ROL is very, very busy tackling to get RO6 done for A9home - I do remember that Paul told me at the RISC OS Roadshow in the Netherlands (oops, that was well over a year ago) that the primary goal was to get RO for the A9home done.

As for Pauls "He also claimed that there would never be another native RISC OS hardware platform...": Well, I dare say that I'd be indeed very surprised if any other company starts with native hardware based on ROL's RO6 considering the track record for A9home - you know, that really nice, small, silent RISC OS box for which ROL claimed to be working with high priority to get the new Select done for... On the other hand I wouldn't be surprised if CTL suddenly has something like IYONIX2 on sale.

As for "VirtualAcorn on Linux": If I remember correctly RISC OS 5 licenses shall be pretty cheap now so perhaps a VA for Linux (or any other OS) using RO5 might be interesting since it could perhaps be much cheaper... On the other hand isn't VA the only future market for ROL since I have the impression that they're not into IYONIX Select and progress for A9home doesn't suggest much interst either and Paul stated that he doesn't expect new hardware anyhow :-)

hzn on 20/10/07 8:22AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

I would hope that as the RISC OS kernel is broken into smaller modules, it is still following a plan to allow it to work on all sorts of hardware, rather than just relying on emulation. Hopefully to the extent that if new hardware came along, RISC OS itself would not be need modifying, just the support modules/drivers would need to be created for the hardware.

This would allow small developers to make their own RISC OS systems far more easily. They write all the drivers in house, rather than having to pay ROL to port it.

I would hope that both versions of RISC OS remain compatible, and the kernels are developed to a similar plan.

jess on 20/10/07 9:54AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

In reply to jess:

An email I had from Advantage 6 seems to suggest what you wrote is true. AD6 wrote they were in the process or porting their drivers to be RO6 compatiable. Although personally I would not have thought that process would have taken them this long when you consider they already had drivers working with RO. Or is RO6 really that much different from RO4.42?

sa110 on 20/10/07 10:01AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

One would hope that ultimately, once drivers were written they wouldn't be tied to one version of the OS. (And hopefully not one fork.) However the OS may not be sufficiently modularized yet. Perhaps RO 6 is improved in that respect, and that is why a rewrite is needed.

jess on 20/10/07 11:04AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

hzn wrote>"Well, I dare say that I'd be indeed very surprised if any other company starts with native hardware based on ROL's RO6 considering the track record for A9home "

Yes it's unlikely with ROL's offering but let's not forget ROOL/Castle's RO5.xx - so long as ROL don't succeed in "tying up" a sufficient number of developers to "closed" contracts then the option of porting the more open RO5.xx model to other hardware will be available.

and jc wrote>"It was necessary for ROL to be inclusive (old hardware & virtual) and a pity Castle/Iyonix haven't made it easy for their product to be included too."

The sad reality appears to be that ROL *can't* actually build an OS for any platform that *isn't* simply a RISC PC or something emulated to look like a RISC PC. It appears that even with sufficient technical information (a comprehensive published TRM, a CD full of datasheets, a swodge of RO5 source and a site full of API details) that ROL can't seem to deliver an Iyonix Select port. Even with a business partner (Ad6) that is committed to help ROL there seems to be issues getting RO finished for A9Home. As it's not just a Castle/Iyonix issue the problem must lie elsewhere (nice try JC - but no cigar ;-)

)

The path of least resistance open to ROL would be a purely emulated one (at the moment the most viable option being VA on Windows - and I don't see that changing anytime soon - I'd view a Linux port a *long* way off).

So *if* Paul is saying emulation is the way to go - yes for a purely software oriented company with little low level hardware programming capacity emulation may be the only route. So long as the emulator vendor can present a platform that *looks* to RO like a RiscPC then ROL will be able to use (without worrying about the low level hardware niceities

Is this a good thing for the platform?, probably not. Any loss of hardware diversity and capacity to support it is, I would argue a bad thing. But at least the ROOL option offers an alternative.

AMS on 20/10/07 4:32PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

In reply to AMS:

ROL have 32bitted their RISC OS. They have provided both 4.40 and 4.42 for the A9home, AD6 have written their drivers for both 4.40 and 4.42 (therefore it does work on non RPC hardware).It would appear the issue with RO6 on the A9home is down to drivers. Drivers that AD6 wrote and I'm led to believe are either rewriting or patching to work with RO6. Last I heard, it was thought a release of RO6 for the A9home before the end of this year was said to be not unrelealistic. However only time will tell.

sa110 on 20/10/07 10:06PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Drivers require the " low level hardware programming capacity" I was referring to. Yes ROL have undoubtedly done much good work on 32bitting and producing a product that is a bit more portable than what they originally received - but if the problem is producing drivers being a difficult and time consuming task then emulation may appear to be an *easier* route as Microsoft (or other hardware vendors) have handled all the driver stuff for you *and* the emulator vendor has produced a product that to all intents and purposes looks, feels and moves like a RISC PC.

I don't doubt that ROL *will* finish the OS for the A9 (as to when who knows) the issue is more would ROL ever take on another ARM native hardware project (in that I'd include porting Select to Iyonix) and I suspect unless someone dumped a suitcase full of cash on their desk I would think not.

It really is down to persuading people to part with money for something that doesn't already exist and then with limited resources trying to implement it. Doing that with "new" hardware requires more resource *up front* - it also can have unseen difficulties and can take a *long time* (Omega and A9 being cases in point). In comparison porting to a "known" platform (like an emulated one) is less "greedy" of these resources and makes it more feasible to satisfy delivery in a reasonable time. A9, unfortunately, was just a tad too different to be easily accomodated. You'll note that updates for RPC's and VARPC are more frequent and take less time to arrive.

As A9 becomes more of a "known" quantity to ROL it'll become like the RPC and VA and get more frequent updates I suspect. Problem is if the quote from Paul Middleton is accurate it very much sounds like they'll never put themselves through all that hassle again - and that the *relative* ease of supporting an emulated ARM environment will win out.

Future native hardware will, therefore, need OS support from elsewhere (i.e., independant developers updating the ROOL/Castle sources) rather than from ROL.

AMS on 21/10/07 11:51AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

In reply to AMS:

You stated "I don't doubt that ROL will finish the OS for the A9". People keep saying the OS is not finished. However the A9home I use certainly seems to have a stable and finished OS. An OS which is later than Adjust but prior to RO6.

What people are waiting for it would appear is not ROL, but AD6. AD6 have recently made available via CJE a USB update (an update that I have had for sometime). I expect the next update will be to the sounddma module, this fixes the problem with the sound stopping. An A9home compatible version of RO6 is the next thing we A9homers are holding out for. Not having RO6 on the A9home is not in anyway stopping the A9home being fully used.

sa110 on 21/10/07 12:13PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

sa110>That is because in the *old* days Acorn did all the OS - hardware drivers included. ROL don't (which is what I said earlier).

They may feel confortable about delegating someone else to do the drivers - but this takes the OS development out of their full control. When all the drivers are present and everything works then the OS is complete - not before. The fact that a part of that work has to be done by an organisation *other* than ROL is neither here nor there.

From ROL's perspective having an emulated platform *only* would eliminate *all* the hanging round on others to complete drivers. They could just "ship" the RO product the moment their internal and beta testing had finished.

AMS on 21/10/07 12:36PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

If the OS is structured properly, there is no reason for the core OS and drivers to have to be shipped in lock step. With a well defined interface and separation of the binary image, development and release could occur independently. I hate to say it, but that is a key advantage of the RO5 HAL model, which should have been at least replicated in the RO6 work instead of sticking with the single ROM image and module chain.

As for emulation only, that assumes that the RISC OS environment will never be able to interface to any new peripherals, reducing it to a dead OS and mere toy. If emulation has any future, RISC OS must make direct use of equipment such as scanners, webcams and other USB kit in the same way it can currently use the hosts networking, without having to drop back out to the native environment and use non RISC OS software - otherwise that's where they'll stay.

druck on 22/10/07 8:51AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

druck>Agreed.

I am not actually advocating emulation as a route to preserve RISC OS - just trying to see it from ROL's perspective - where emulation (from their view point) may throw up fewer development problems than trying to support the native ARM platform.

AMS on 22/10/07 11:19PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

If the developer of an ARM based operating system, can't support ARM based platforms, its time to pack up and go home.

druck on 23/10/07 12:09AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Since I'm normally using machines via remoter access, an emulator or virtual machine on a decent host is a very suitable solution for me.

However I don't think it is partically ideal for non IT people. It is certainly unlikely to attract new users who aren't very IT literate already.

I think the best way forward with emulation would an x86 system with an arm emulator at a very low level in the system, so that in effect RISC OS would be the only system. (Apps would be ARM only, but presumably modules could be written in x86 to take advantage of the native hardware speed)

jess on 23/10/07 9:37AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

druck>Yes if ROL were the *only* option and if they couldn't implement ARM based versions of the OS I'd agree. Fortunately the ROOL option is an alternative. That having been said I'd be saddened to see ROL unable to continue supporting ARM.

jess>Yes if there were *absolutely* no alternative - *BUT* if ROL preferred to use emulation so as to *avoid* developing drivers for low level ARM use they'd be even *less* inclined I'd think to try make all the x86 ones that would be required to get RISC OS running "natively" on x86.

I'd also point out the ROOL license *precludes* use of its sources on *emulated* ARM platforms (which is fair enough it's bad enough one RISC OS developer supporting emulation having *both* support emulation would - in effect - truly mean the end of the RISC OS as a computing platform IMHO).

AMS on 23/10/07 1:15PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

"I'd also point out the ROOL license precludes use of its sources on emulated ARM platforms (which is fair enough it's bad enough one RISC OS developer supporting emulation having both support emulation would - in effect - truly mean the end of the RISC OS as a computing platform IMHO)."

No it doesn't. The licence states "... PROVIDED THAT such work is only intended to be used in conjunction with an embodiment (whether physical or emulated) of one or more versions of the ARM processor architecture."

dms on 23/10/07 1:57PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

dms>My sincerest appologies... (dagnabbit my brain is becoming more like swiss cheese everyday!).

Yes you're right and I got it wrong. I wouldn't mind but after a brief trawl I found *me* asking the question does that mean a JIT (Just in time recompilation of ARM code) would be allowed. If not you *could* emulate an ARM to run RISC OS - just not translate the code to x86 to speed things up (your emulation would be a bit tardy but would work). Don't know if that ever got an answer.

So yes it does seem (I'd agree with your reading of it) that you can emulate ARM and use ROOL source in doing it.

Appologies to all (again...)

AMS on 23/10/07 7:24PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Can anyone enlighten me for what exactly purpose has Nokia been using RISC OS? Please?

fantasian2 on 23/10/07 8:29PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

ams: The whole point of separating the hardware drivers from the kernel is that the OS writers don't need to write drivers, they just create a good interface. The drivers can be written by others.

jess on 24/10/07 12:12AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

UniPod speed tested
IDE and ethernet with a need for speed

28 comments, latest by micken on 17/8/04 3:53PM. Published: 2 Jun 2004

Random article

RISC OS Sometime unrest grows
Readers praying for RISC OS Anytime Now [Updated]

23 comments, latest by martin on 18/10/07 12:57PM. Published: 14 Oct 2007

Useful links

News and media:
Iconbar • MyRISCOS • ArcSite • RISCOScode • ANS • C.S.A.Announce • Archive • Qercus • RiscWorld • Drag'n'Drop • GAG-News

Top developers:
RISCOS Ltd • RISC OS Open • MW Software • R-Comp • Advantage Six • VirtualAcorn

Dealers:
CJE Micros • APDL • Castle • a4 • X-Ample • Liquid Silicon • Webmonster

Usergroups:
WROCC • RONE • NKACC • IRUG • SASAUG • ROUGOL • RONWUG • MUG • WAUG • GAG • RISCOS.be

Useful:
RISCOS.org.uk • RISCOS.org • RISCOS.info • Filebase • Chris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collection • NetSurf

Non-RISC OS:
The Register • The Inquirer • Apple Insider • BBC News • Sky News • Google News • xkcd • diodesign

© 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
"'Only the truly memorable stunts are worth a write up'. So, what sort of memorable 'stunt' might be worth a write up?"
Page generated in 0.3603 seconds.