More Vpod rumours surface

Following on from our earlier exclusive on the cryptically pre-announced Vpod from Stuart Tyrrell Developments, a few more titbits are doing the rounds.

Links

Previous: Command-line tool splices and edits video and audio
Next: ArtWorks 2.9 set for Wakefield 2009 launch

Discussion

Fantasic news the Risc PC owners. One also assumes such a podule would also work in an A7000. sa110 on 11/4/09 5:12PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Would the original Unipod be upgradeable to this Vpod? jlavallin on 11/4/09 8:21PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

If it's rumoured to be an UNIpod with video, I doubt you could "upgrade", only part exchange, due to the extra hardware required to implement the new features. rjek on 11/4/09 8:32PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ] I would be surprised if this were possible. diomus on 11/4/09 8:45PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

CPLDs are nothing new and you can't read much into them; The UNIpod also has two CPLDs, almost all IDE cards made for RiscPCs in recent years are based on CPLDs, and even the ViewFinder was basically a CPLD on a podule with an AGP socket attached. rjek on 11/4/09 9:49PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Yes, but those are using the CPDL in a PAL-like way simply to replicate a large amount of combinational logic. The implication here is that the CPDL is used in a FPGA-like way, ie to be reprogrammable for different decodings. Anon on 14/4/09 11:58AM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Different decodings? I suspect very strongly that they're at least partly used simply as an interface to the podule bus, like almost all other CPLDs on podules are used for. Also, CPLDs tend to only be programmable via JTAG, unlike FPGAs, which tend to have an external EEPROM that could be reprogrammed easily from the computer it's plugged into. Unless Advantage Six also plan on selling JTAG dongles with RISC OS software, though! rjek on 14/4/09 12:17PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Here's some more material for your rumour mill: 'V' is the letter after 'U', so it may be nothing to do with video afterall. Unipod had USB1.1, so maybe Vpod has USB2.0 and/or firewire. Maybe the video works in reverse, as a video input. Anon on 17/4/09 11:57AM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Surely that'd make it the VniPod? Video input would be of limited use... rjek on 17/4/09 1:36PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ] Or maybe V is the Roman Numeral for 5, so that the Vpod has 5 features rather than the three in the UNIpod ? broon on 17/4/09 6:52PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ] So the Unipod should have called the tripod? Except it wasn't three -- there's a parallel port too that nobody uses... probably because STD would never send out info about HOW to use it! imj on 17/4/09 6:58PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ] Don't forget the 8 bit expansion socket with econet compatibility! rjek on 17/4/09 7:06PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ] Yeah, I understood that to be one and the same with the parallel port. I asked for info several times, but nada. Kind of too late to care now. Waste. imj on 17/4/09 11:30PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

I've used a UNI-Pod and still do. As long as the latest software was installed, it fixed all the filer issues the early stuff had and it's still going strong. It was a few years ago but I did some experimenting and did get the internal 8 bit expansion working with an Econet module, sound sampler and SCSI interface. It was a hack to get the software working but all it took was to change the address offset from the default Econet address to point to the card and a patch to the drivers to fiddle with the IRQ mapping. The podule seems to have multiple IRQ sources and there were registers to enable the expansion FIQ/IRQ to the podule bus. Although it had an FIQ pin, it appeared as just another IRQ. I chose the podule base offset address according to slot number and the podule access cycle needed for the devices on the "econet" modules. For the sampler and econet, I worked out which pins were connected from the module to the the 15 way back panel connector and wired up a plug to suit. Worked quite nicely. I assume that this is the "parallel port" mentioned in previous comments? I found my old notes the other day - original hard drive long gone - and the more technically inspired users might find this of interest: Expansion socket base offset &3A00 A0 of the slot was connected to LA2 of the bus and so on. IRQstatus &3C00 IRQraw &3C80 IRQmask &3D00 status was the masked IRQ = raw AND mask I worked out that the expansion "FIQ" mask bit was bit 7 and the IRQ mask bit was on bit 1. Bit 0 appeared to be the global podule IRQ. Whenever I played with bit 0 of the IRQmask, bad things happened The other bits appeared to be for the IDE, network and USB. It goes without saying that a read/modify/write was needed with IRQs off to change any of the mask bits. Back on topic, I for one am looking forward to seeing exactly what's on the new V-POD. If naming is anything like the UNI-Pod (usb, network, ide) then I vote that V is for Video littlebird on 18/4/09 1:43PM [ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

A9home DIY laptop: first pictures
And other odds and sods from the Christmas 2007 show
 22 comments, latest by sa110 on 1/6/08 4:47PM. Published: 1 Dec 2007

Random article

Your guide to the RISC OS browser debate
Time to invoke Peter Naulls [Exclusive] [Updated]
 Discuss this. Published: 15 Aug 2002

Useful links