Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Why you should use a PC at work instead of RISC OS: Read and learn

By Chris Williams. Published: 13th May 12:42:41 | Permalink | Printable

While surfing earlier today, this editor stumbled across this amusing, tongue in cheek stab at those who need to rationalise why using Windows 98 at work is better than installing a network of RISC OS machines. Enjoy.

Why a PC is better for work than an Acorn


Kent WebNet

Previous: Richard Murray opens QuickVoy source
Next: A note from the editors

Discussion

Viewing threaded comments | View comments unthreaded, listed by date | Skip to the end

No comments posted - yet. Post one yourself or come back soon.

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • RISC OS in Japan
    Who, where, what, when, how?
     13 comments, latest by Sawadee on 14/4/05 10:01PM. Published: 4 Apr 2005

  • Random article

  • PhotoFiler handed out in free download
    Ex-commercial software available with source code
     8 comments, latest by harmsy on 21/2/08 6:42PM. Published: 10 Feb 2008

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Drobe won't credit us for breaking stories. Oh well, that's journalism for you."
    Page generated in 0.0425 seconds.