If you want to say that, then that's your choice. I said that my investigation indicates the converse of what John has said repeatedly, and I'm waiting (again) to find out what they have to say. If they have something to say which convinces me that their claim is correct and that my investigations were somehow flawed then it will be clear to all what the situation is.
I would not have contacted the copyright holders if I did not believe that something was awry. Russell would not have posted to linux kernel list if he did not feel there was some substance to my beliefs.
I suggest that if you have problems understanding the GPL you consult GPL itself, or at the least the GPL FAQ.