Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

Dougal>

Sorry Man, I wouldn't want to be responsible for raising your blood pressure. So I leave the register one where it is ;)

Yes I take your point about the market. At one level Intel have the desktop market sown up, at another level ARM have the embedded processor market sown up. I think my point (perhaps unclear due to hamfisted writing on my part) is that Intel were forced to upgrade the Pentium because of competition from AMD. ARM has (so far) made sure that it has *no* compeditors that can offer an ARM instruction set compatible processor - and hence (perhaps) things have been left sit a little (IMHO). If ARM had had the same sort of competition as Intel had perhaps ARM would be aiming somewhat higher than the 400MHz they currently aspire to (as high end) - which some of their licensees (e.g., Intel and Samsung) have already shown is a breechable target.

Spriteman> The point is that *no* currently existing processor allows ARM code to be run as fast as the fastest ARM's currently available.

I don't quite follow your point about hardware abstraction (VA uses bog standard RISC OS which doesn't). Just because ROS 5 hardware abstracts does *not* necessarily mean you'll get better performance as the native OS it will call (hypothetically WindowsXP or Linux) would have *further* hardware abstraction for it's own purposes (you'd in effect be doing the hardware abstraction step twice - once in ROS (in emulated ARM code) and once in the underlying OS (in that machines native code)). Or have I missed something ?

-- Annraoi

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 21/9/03 3:48PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Star Fighter 3000: The Next Generation review
    Star Fighter 3000: The Next Generation was born from the 3D0 version of the original SF3K that was ported back to RISC OS and this year freed from programmers' hard discs for the platform to enjoy, writes Andrew Weston. In this review Andrew weighs up much-improved graphics and sound against playability and stability.
     19 comments, latest by AW on 9/12/08 8:45PM. Published: 17 Nov 2008

  • Random article

  • November News Summary
    Ok, it's an end of month round up. Application news, user group events and the usual fun poking.
     6 comments, latest by nunfetishist on 24/11/02 11:34PM. Published: 24 Nov 2002

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "It burns my eyes!"
    Page generated in 0.0568 seconds.