Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

To SparkY/em2ac: any OS that can't run natively on specific hardware is not a true OS, so I too would prefer a RO laptop. But it would be no faster, possibly slower, than an Iyonix and the time cannot be far off when the best all-round RO performance will be available, not on an Iyonix, but on VARPC running on a 4 or 5Ghz AMD or Intel chip. There would be precious little in it now if the resolution restrictions of VARPC were fixed. In '96 the fastest ARM and x86 chips were clocked at 200mhz, since when the former have tripled in speed, the latter by fifteenfold! If the trend continues, either RO must sit, Panther-like, on top of a Linux kernel or be abstracted radically to run on the PowerPC architecture. All IMHO, of course...

 is a RISC OS Userbucksboy on 6/12/03 3:53PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • The Intel XScale conundrum
    Chin up, could be worse
     20 comments, latest by steelpillow on 26/8/05 6:53PM. Published: 25 Aug 2005

  • Random article

  • Pull yourself together with TrueSep: From binary to ink finary

     Discuss this. Published: 28 Nov 2000

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "D underheads R adicals O r B loody E xcentrics"
    Page generated in 0.0289 seconds.