Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

You guys seem to be talking about Microsoft Windows, which isn't my area of expertise (sorry).

However, I was always told that more recent versions of Microsoft Windows used something called "pre-emptive multi-tasking".

This, I was told, is different to the sort of multi-tasking that RISC OS uses.

Not just a little bit different, no.

Whilst RISC OS multi-tasking could mean that the whole computer locked up quite often, proper pre-emptive multi-tasking (as implemented in Windows NT, XP and 2000, and maybe in 95 and 98) would mean that all applications would still allow a responsive system overall.

What went wrong with these "pre-emptive" Windows versions?:

If it didn't work right, why are people still asking for this technology under RISC OS?


 is a RISC OS Userdgs on 2/6/04 10:35PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Drobe Launch Pad Prize Draw winners announced

     Discuss this. Published: 15 Jan 2001

  • Random article

  • CJE down to last stocks of CMOS memory batteries
    Machines to lose time, memory, maybe catch fire and explode
     21 comments, latest by chrisj on 27/5/05 2:09PM. Published: 24 May 2005

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Don't expect Chris to acknowledge where Drobe's articles originally came from"
    Page generated in 0.0374 seconds.