Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

I understand the technical benefits of preemptive multitasking, but I think it's fair to say that it's not a panacea.

It's perfectly possible for the action of one application to stall another simply by making use of the same resource. For example, when large apps are being paged in from the hard drive on my Windows 2000 system, practically everything else grinds to a halt because it all needs access to the harddrive. This happens very often. From a user's POV I find cooperative multitaksing under RISC OS bliss in comparison.

Windows isn't the best example, but other systems have problems too. Is the responsiveness of RO and preemptive multitaksing always compatible I wonder? :indiff:

 is a RISC OS Userflypig on 3/6/04 2:26PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Desktop Repton Plus review
    It hurt my brain
     10 comments, latest by AW on 12/2/05 8:06PM. Published: 10 Feb 2005

  • Random article

  • ARM Linux Distributions
    Slackware and Zynot come to ARM
     Discuss this. Published: 27 Jan 2004

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "So, if I had 'teased' you with spin you might have printed it. Instead because it was simply factual you decided not to"
    Page generated in 0.0266 seconds.