mavhc: "Castle say they own ROS, ROL say they don't"
Where did ROL say that Castle don't own RISC OS? ROL have said that ROL has abided by all conditions of the head license, and that Castle's use of RISC OS in the Iyonix is "disputed". They nowhere say that Castle don't own RISC OS, or the head license. (This is just yet another red herring put about by people who don't know what they're talking about).
On a separate matter, contrary to what the above Drobe article currently says (it may change later), several RISCOS Ltd shareholders have already stated their views on Drobe.