mavhc> Here's the odd thing, for a while (again in the transcript) - ROL *did* pay royalties to Castle.
Where there seems to have been an issue was because Castle (quite rightly in my humble opinion) took the view that VA was an unapproved product. Castle seemed to want to charge ROL a different Royalty fee for this - and ROL baulked and rather than just *not* pay the extra - they paid nothing.
Because (for a while) ROL did pay Castle, then it could be said that ROL (in effect) *did* accept that Castle were the owner of the RISC OS. It was only when Castle started to behave like the owner that ROL had a problem methinks.
The reason stated for ROL not paying the license fee (I am not sure who stated it so I won't give attribution) was that if ROL had paid the invoice in *any* measure it would have constituted acceptance of the Invoice in whole (including the change in payments).
Sounds like a classic case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.
Search the archives
Today's featured article
The new apple of my eye Would you swap your dusty Acorn for a polished Apple computer? Martin Hansen has been checking out the world of Steve Jobs and his range of shiny kit. 15 comments, latest by adh1003 on 6/1/09 1:06PM. Published: 17 Nov 2008