Depends on the market.
I suspect most people who would buy the Iyonix understand the platform enough to know what they are paying for.
If Castle is aiming at Joe Public, then the price point to system spec ratio will never attract them as there expectations have been influenced by x86 PC specs.
Indeed it would look as though they are getting less but paying more.
The MS/Intel relationships is a good indicator as Intel and Microsofts core business will be based around XP and x86 processors, with increasing focus on mobile devices slowly changing that.
However in the short term I suspect they will need to maintain a viable, backwards compatible chip architecture. Moving to ARM powered technology for desktop machines would be an expensive proposition, not only for the chip maker and MS, but for other companies offering preipherals. Not to mention probelms with legacy support.
I think to be honest that Castle have it right, they have a proven system spec with a good customer base. Future chip upgrades will depend heavily on the production of a chip that 'fits the bill', intel at present don't seem to be moving in this direction with ARM cores.
Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.
Search the archives
Today's featured article
Mourners at tragic Paul Vigay's funeral to plant acorns in his memory At the funeral of RISC OS and civil liberties activist Paul Vigay, who died last month, acorns were passed around to mourners to plant across the country in his memory. Journalist Jim Nagel describes the touching service after attending the funeral, held in Petersfield, Hants. 1 comment, latest by JohnR on 23/3/09 7:10PM. Published: 22 Mar 2009