Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

harmsy: Such a list would probably need to be drawn up by someone who knows both packages really well, and most businesses that use RiscCAD or ProCAD seem to be firmly committed to either one or the other.

Peter McCafferty, who is one of the beta testers of RiscCAD version 10, and uses it for architectural designs, will be giving a detailed presentation on the new features (and the software in general) at the RISC OS User Group of London this coming Monday, 17th October. Anyone interested can email me for more details.

dgs@segfault.co.uk

 is a RISC OS Userdgs on 13/10/05 6:49PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Iyonix Review Part One
    The hardware, the alternatives, the history.
     16 comments, latest by Martyn Fox on 22/4/03 1:01PM. Published: 5 Dec 2002

  • Random article

  • RISC OS web browsing survey results published
    Designing a RISC OS website? Take note of Eli-Jean's research
     3 comments, latest by on 22/9/01 11:27AM. Published: 18 Sep 2001

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Drobe seems to be a clearing house for rumour and gossip"
    Page generated in 0.0351 seconds.