Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

Hmm. I don't agree that whether something is proprietary or 'open' is actually the salient point. I'd argue that actually the relevant point is whether the format is appropriate and necessary. If I can't read a format I don't really care whether it is open or not. I certainly don't think that would change the childishness quotient. (Sending as plain text, however, may well do.)

Does Open Office even have a RISC OS version?

In any case... Lets look at the possibilities and probable outcomes when dealing with someone who sends inappropriately formated files you can't read.

1) Run around and try to read them. Reply in text files. Probably most people can read word files on other peoples computers, and probably most people would fold like umbrellas and follow this method. However, the bureaucrat won't even know there is a problem. 2) Send a [polite] message asking for the same information in any of the formats you think would be useful. Probable outcome : bureaucrat disregards, or conveniently loses, or forgets to do so, or just gets annoyed and considers the information served. 3) (1), but also (2) regarding future correspondence - bureaucrat disregards your polite message - after all, you managed to read it didn't you, so why put themselves out? 4) (1) but reply in a form you find convenient and suspect they won't (either proprietary or 'open'; it doesn't make any difference to the recipient who can't read it). Now they definitely get annoyed, but presumably also get your point. 5) (3), then (4) on subsequent correspondence.

Now I don't know anything extra about Tarquin's case, even whether he was receiving Word files from them, but if he's done (5) then it may well be the only way to actually get the point across. Whether it is worth doing when being sued I'm not going to judge.

 is a RISC OS UserLoris on 23/3/06 6:14PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Drobe price comparison chart
    Checking out the competition
     21 comments, latest by govind on 14/11/03 2:15PM. Published: 9 Nov 2003

  • Random article

  • Oregano, Firefox and NetSurf reviewed
    So close yet so far
     27 comments, latest by adrianl on 26/8/05 9:33PM. Published: 25 Aug 2005

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Drobe seems to be a clearing house for rumour and gossip"
    Page generated in 0.0586 seconds.