TonyStill, that is the problem!
The law is essentially guilty until proven innocent. (This is why it isn't a good law.) The file may not even be encrypted - it may be random garbage, such as you might get, say, after a disk recovery.
They can pick a file and demand that you decrypt it - if you can't, you are guilty, unless you can prove that it doesn't contain encrypted data. Good luck with that.
Regarding 'undetectability' - OK, some may be detectable. If you have two pictures, one with and one without your message, that is a giveaway, for example. If you've ever edited a JPEG in some non-obvious manner they might pick this up as a false-positive.
IIRC a Register article described an analysis which suggested that 25% of pictures on the internet may contain steganographic data. Doesn't reassure me.
Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.
Search the archives
Today's featured article
Mourners at tragic Paul Vigay's funeral to plant acorns in his memory At the funeral of RISC OS and civil liberties activist Paul Vigay, who died last month, acorns were passed around to mourners to plant across the country in his memory. Journalist Jim Nagel describes the touching service after attending the funeral, held in Petersfield, Hants. 1 comment, latest by JohnR on 23/3/09 7:10PM. Published: 22 Mar 2009