Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

Heh. I recognise a lot of this! It's a shame Acorn messed it up. However, in a way I find using the platform a lot more fun these days. It's a hobby OS. Sure, we'll never be fastest again, but projects like NetSurf and ArtWorks are still around, making using the platform very enjoyable in those areas where it's still viable.

I agree with you about Wimp Programming for All - it got me started, and was a great guide to the Wimp.

Here's to 2008 too. I have a feeling this one's going to be better than the last. In particular, I'm optimistic about seeing real progress from ROOL, the GCC team, the NetSurf group, and the prolific Martin Wuerthner. Let's hope. :)

 is a RISC OS Userlym on 3/1/08 9:48PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Brush up your ARM coding skills with Matthew Bloch's assembler guide

     Discuss this. Published: 27 Feb 2001

  • Random article

  • Why so much infighting?
    Paul Stewart sounds off on the platform's electronic pollution
     24 comments, latest by flypig on 7/7/06 7:36PM. Published: 1 Jul 2006

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "So, if I had 'teased' you with spin you might have printed it. Instead because it was simply factual you decided not to"
    Page generated in 0.0571 seconds.