Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

@AMS:

I don't support the Iyonix, because it does not offer enough processing power. And if it will do so in the future (say via a PCI-FPGA-card) it would now be way too late. For the same reasons I would no longer support the finished Omega, if it was to be released now. And as for the Iyonix having an FPGA: Is it user-programmable? Is there an API and some kind of OS module that prevents different applications competing for the use of this FPGA to mess up the system? I thought not. And even if all this existed, there are not enough software developers left in this market, for it to actually make a difference.

What you are saying about OSS code usually not being optimised for a specific platform, is of course very true. I said much the same thing in my post, where I mentioned, that it often is highly abstracted. Abstraction often leads to bloated code. Modern processors are so fast, that this does not matter, however even the fastest ARM processors are very, very slow compared to modern PowerPC or x86 processors.

There is also a lot of OSS code out there, wich is highly optimized for specific processors, simply because even the fastest processors available today are only just about fast enough for some tasks. These tasks tend to be the ones that power-users lust after (like video-encoding) and bring all the prestige.

Personally, I don't see why we should choose between the two options (a and b) you mention. I think the only chance RISC OS has to survive on the desktop is a combination of both options.

 is a RISC OS UserJGZimmerle on 20/08/06 6:14PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • An introduction to IP networks
    Part one of masking the 'net
     10 comments, latest by Umair on 9/9/04 10:11PM. Published: 4 Sep 2004

  • Random article

  • NetSurf set to get up to four students in GSOC 2008
    As many as four budding coders could be paid to develop web browser by Google
     Discuss this. Published: 9 Apr 2008

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Drobe is just cheap British press"
    Page generated in 0.0452 seconds.