Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

AMS wrote: "I can understand that, but you do see how that might give some people a bad case of jitters. The phrase ''get RISC OS applications running on another system using a compatibility layer'' - how does that help RISC OS ? Does it simply give another OS the ability to run RISC OS programs (in a fashion) and further weaken RISC OS ?"

I was saying that it *wouldn't* appeal to me to do that, and that's the most interesting project I could conceive of doing! The best you could hope for is that the applications would run as they did on RISC OS, and that isn't interesting to me.

"What I am driving at is the notion that it is preferable to have the maximum possible control of the platform and OS we operate on."

Right, but even Castle don't have that much control over the underlying hardware platform. Once Acorn spun ARM off into a separate entity, it never had all that much control over the available hardware.

"The radical thing that needs to happen is that RISC OS users should get behind their platform, support its hardware manufacturers and stick with it. In our small little pond we have some influence - the same can't be said in the much larger Linux (or Windows) pool."

I think it's only an illusion of influence within the small pond. Although it seems counterintuitive, you have a much better chance to influence others in the Linux or BSD communities, mostly because you don't have to negotiate with a single Acorn-style vendor to get what you want. Whether you ultimately influence other users is up to you, but you can at least get your hands dirty and write code if you can't persuade people to adopt your vision. If you look carefully, you can see former RISC OS users getting involved in open source projects.

"I don't want to move from one OS failure immediately to another that will be killed at some future date - it makes more sense to admit defeat in that circumstance and opt (much as I would hate to do this) for the envitable winner, Windows (you can't even imagine how much I galls me to say that!)."

Then we might as well all give up now. The thing is: I can't see RISC OS getting as popular as Linux now is in the wider world, even on desktop machines. I think Linux is going to be around for a while.

 is a RISC OS Userdavidb on 25/08/06 8:01PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Wakefield 2009 wrap-up, photos and video
    The weekend's RISC OS event has been and gone and we've got the rest of our lives to look forward to. Here's a round-up of extra news and Drobe's show-related coverage and some photos taken from Wakefield 2009 - plus a video from the show floor.
     16 comments, latest by AW on 29/4/09 7:41PM. Published: 27 Apr 2009

  • Random article

  • Experimental Linux 2.4 and 2.6 kernels built
    Brave Iyonix and StrongARM RiscPC users step forward
     1 comment, latest by hzn on 21/7/05 4:24PM. Published: 21 Jul 2005

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Drobe often has glaring factual errors that could simply be avoided with the bare minimum of research"
    Page generated in 0.0622 seconds.