Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

Both surveys underestimate the number of RiscPCs (and earlier) machines in use. Datawave is right to be celebrating with that cheer and I think readers modded him down without thinking it through. If I had thought that druck's earlier announcement - that all serious RISC OS users had already bought an Iyonix - I would have been very pessimistic about a future. Thankfully I knew it to be wide of the mark and know that there are plenty of RISC OS users still to upgrade and be future customers for A9s and Iyonix pcs. Not that we should stop there of course - we still need to sell to lapsed RISC OS users, semi-lapsed (VRP) users, and encourage brand new purchasers. But at this point, it's good to be reminded that there are sales that can be made for both hardware and software developers.

 is a RISC OS Userjc on 11/11/05 3:39PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Beginner's guide to manipulating stock photos
    Getting your message across with ArtWorks and Photodesk
     9 comments, latest by sascott on 8/8/06 9:16AM. Published: 6 Aug 2006

  • Random article

  • Software News
    Image processing, font management, education and more
     11 comments, latest by dgs on 2/11/03 7:19PM. Published: 23 Oct 2003

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "So, if I had 'teased' you with spin you might have printed it. Instead because it was simply factual you decided not to"
    Page generated in 0.0433 seconds.