Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

Druck wrote:

"Some of the best additions were API extensions, but have not been capitalised upon because developers wont support a subsection of the market based on a diminishing number of old machines."

Given that RiscPCs are the leading machines in terms of use, (according to drobe and Archive figures), I'm not sure how they could be classed as "diminishing". In fact, during its peak, there were more people subscribed to Select than those now with Iyonixes. For every person who says they don't miss Select features on the Iyonix, there's another who says they do.

ROL were in a bit of a lose-lose situation, so you can't entirely blame them for trying. If they add application-style features to the OS, they'll get burned by commercial developers. If they add API and lower level functionality, they get burned by customers when no developers use the new APIs. If they had the resources to make the system PMT+fully memory protected, then you'd probably lose at least 75% of your software through compatibility breakage.

The process of 32bitting software turned out to be pretty trivial, which did Castle a lot of favours, but if you think about it, not a lot of the new APIs in RISC OS 5 are used outside of the handful of new hardware drivers - and this is probably for the same reason developers are unwilling to commit to using the Select-only APIs. The Iyonix is faster than the RiscPC, but clearly not fast enough for the mjaority of users to part with their cash for the price tag it carries.

AdvantageSix have been pretty crafty in aiming their machine at a middle space in the market with performance just below the Iyonix and above the RiscPC, and with a lower price tag than the Iyonix. And if you want things like an internal DVD drive, then you're welcome to buy an Iyonix. Hopefully that'll encourage people to upgrade to recent versions of ROS 4 and persuading developers into leveraging from it.

I can see this turning into a survival of the fittest, where the OS with the most users will continue, which is a bit unfortunate as it leaves potential buyers hoping they jump onto the ship that doesn't sink.

Just my opinion, of course.

 is a RISC OS Userdiomus on 12/11/05 09:53AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Archive magazine reviewed
    A media watch special
     10 comments, latest by diomus on 27/10/07 12:01PM. Published: 23 Oct 2007

  • Random article

  • RISC OS 4.02 reaches end of life
    Adjust is where it's at
     10 comments, latest by nodoubt73 on 18/5/05 2:06PM. Published: 15 Apr 2005

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "RISC OS news reporting? More like Heat magazine"
    Page generated in 0.0523 seconds.