I still don't quite see why the comparison with Dwarf sites isn't relevant, though (nor do I understand the static comment). Whether it's RISC OS or Dwarf, a discussion about out-of-date sites is relevant to any subject. I kind of agree that sites should be updated; but I just can't find it in me to worry about those that are not, is my position. Just making sure that decent information is out there is the main priority; which we both do, of course.
Anyway, this is getting silly, so have your say and then we'll forget about it