Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

Apparently the license is not that ambiguous. The fact that ROL did not take any action when the Iyonix and RISC OS 5 was released was a decision made at the time for the good of the market.

Had they taken the opportunity(presumably with the full backing of Pace) at the time to act against Castle, this dicussion no doubt would not be taking place.

 is a RISC OS Usersa110 on 17/12/08 9:30AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • RISC OS vs. AmigaOS
    Are we so dissimilar?
     36 comments, latest by micken on 18/08/04 8:41PM. Published: 30 Apr 2004

  • Random article

  • A9 and the public spotlight
    Martin Hansen shares his impression of the A9, following the Wednesday night user group presentation
     17 comments, latest by Col1 on 20/12/04 8:41AM. Published: 16 Dec 2004

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "We've written to our solicitor, you'll hear from them"
    Page generated in 0.0558 seconds.