AMS: That's a lot of speculation, with the quite major assumption that ROL didn't ask for (and receive) permission from Pace to make those developments.
How do you explain why Pace never cancelled the licence, if ROL were in such flagrent breah of contract? Also, how Iyonix didn't impinge on ROL's target market if Castle didn't buy the head licence from Pace until after the Iyonix had come out?
Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.
Search the archives
Today's featured article
The new apple of my eye Would you swap your dusty Acorn for a polished Apple computer? Martin Hansen has been checking out the world of Steve Jobs and his range of shiny kit. 15 comments, latest by adh1003 on 6/1/09 1:06PM. Published: 17 Nov 2008