Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

I'll accept that you don't care about ROL's rights, that's probably the first genuine thing you've said.

I do not have a "religious" belief in either company. What I do have is evidence (provided by Castle) that Castle didn't have a right to bring Iyonix into the market without ROL. You (and Druck), however, claim the opposite without any such evidence.

I'll remind you that you started off saying "If Aaron/ROL had a leg to stand on Iyonix would not have happened", and that Pace (and therefore, later, Castle) "had to right to grant or revoke whatever they wanted". These things are just not true, and do smack of either religious belief or maliciousness.

Am I happy about the situation RO has found itself in? Not at all. In fact, I haven't been happy since I found out that ROL had no intention of abstracting the reliance on Acorn hardware out of the OS without someone paying for it first, which was mind-numbingly short sighted. (They wanted to be paid to do the work themselves on a port by port basis, instead of making a generic solution so that multiple hardware vendors could work on their solutions in parallel and at no cost to ROL. Result: no new StrongARM computers.)

Am I happy the Iyonix is gone? I don't really care about it. However, ROL's shareholders kept quiet about it for the good of the overall market for six years; that is not the behaviour of people who want the market to fail, that was the behaviour of pragmatic people. If there is no Iyonix 2, whose fault is that? Castle could have worked with ROL and none of this discussion would ever have happened, but they wanted to be the only player in the market and now what?

RISC OS is already an emulated toy - ARM processors are not about to catch up in terms of raw power and the price of commodity hardware is continuing to fall.

As to me having made up my mind; that's not true. Had you had a reasonable argument, I could have been persuaded, but your assertion seems to be nothing more than "winners" are always right, even if they cheat.

Oh, and the A9home is still out there.

 is a RISC OS UserStoppers on 26/12/08 6:42PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Pace and Sega announce Dreamcast joint venture

     Discuss this. Published: 29 Jan 2001

  • Random article

  • Wakefield 2004 winner list revealed
    Iyonix cash vouchers unwanted
     13 comments, latest by Phlamethrower on 1/6/04 7:42PM. Published: 30 May 2004

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "As their reports are full of errors, [omissions] and mis-reporting - so readers you have been warned... unfortunately Drobe articles cannot be taken at face value"
    Page generated in 0.0598 seconds.