Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

Spot on with the second paragraph. However,at present there is uncertainty about the ownership of RO 5. This is likely to put off developers.

ROL should issue ROOL with a license. The offer of a license that needs signing would mean that ROOL would have to take sides to accept it. They need to stay neutral. Publically issuing a license should solve any doubt problems.

(ie whoever owns RO 5 or the rights to desktop RISC OS, becomes immaterial for non comercial use.)

 is a RISC OS Userjess on 2/1/09 10:44AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • The RISC OS dispute: 12 months on
    What, if anything, came out of the hype from last summer?
     57 comments, latest by sborrill on 27/07/05 11:10AM. Published: 17 Jun 2005

  • Random article

  • Software News
    Nettle, accounting and more - plus no tabloid editing, promise
     28 comments, latest by vshears on 18/4/04 10:26AM. Published: 11 Apr 2004

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Leaking tit bits creates rumours, confusion and often mangles facts"
    Page generated in 0.0786 seconds.