Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Reply to thread

"How's a compiler faster than an intrepreter?" Err. Because it generates native code? Or are you talking about the actual done-once compilation? All RISC OS development I've done for years and years has been on a Linux box. Compilation is essentially instant.

"How's fumbling around with bits in C more reliable than BASIC snippets?" Only amateurs or the disinterested fumble. Everybody else crafts something beautiful and elegant.

"How's lenghty C functions more readable than BASIC?" Casting, structs, type names in function prototypes, block comments, finer-grained variable scoping all make code much much much easier to read.

"How do you square readability as being opposite to code density?" Buh?

"C's best for serious programming." Which NetSurf is.

 is a RISC OS Userrjek on 21/8/09 8:03PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Please login before posting a comment. Use the form on the right to do so or create a free account.

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • An introduction to IP networks
    Part one of masking the 'net
     10 comments, latest by Umair on 9/9/04 10:11PM. Published: 4 Sep 2004

  • Random article

  • Playing a winning hand with Vingt et Un
    <hype> So there is a 32bit BASIC interpreter </hype>
     2 comments, latest by diomus on 24/10/02 8:43AM. Published: 21 Oct 2002

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Drobe doesn't reflect the entirety of RISC OS as it declines to publish some news stories because 'they are not interesting' "
    Page generated in 0.0251 seconds.