The core role of Select is OS development, not hardware support/driver development. ViewFinder previously had to be supported as an exception because no developer was available to maintain a then-obsolete but highly valued podule and OS changes forced a compromise position. A side-effect to the OS is the development and progression of the graphics abstraction interface, which has been extended over the last few Select releases (and now covers more functions than covered by the original 4.XX driver).
This week's activities suggest VF is now in active development - and new hardware/driver developments are usually logically the responsibility of their author, just as would be the case with any other new hardware.
Given that John is actually developing the software here, not the hardware, clearly his development time is significant and reflected in the upgrade price. Suitable Radeons can be purchased for pretty decent prices, so John's predominant charge here is for changes to his driver.
RO6 is in no way broken by the release of a Radeon driver for VF under 4.XX - the previous options of the VPod or R128 ViewFinder still exist.
ROL run a business - so assume /all/ work has to at least break even for it to be worthwhile. Which either means to support a new feature either prices go up, or other features aren't developed.
Would you therefore accept, say, an equivalent 50 euros price hike to Select to cover additional driver development costs (allowing the purchase of cards at 49 euros)? This simply reflects the upgrade price John is presumably putting on his time for equivalent development.
Or instead, should other OS development be slashed back to cover it, and non-Radeon owning RO6 users (ie. all current subscribers) be paying for an update they don't currently use, and in the case of some users (VRPC) will never use?
Or, should it be left to the original developer as to whether he wishes to create Radeon support on RO6 at a later date?
Not suggesting a right answer here - just pointing out the straightforward problem of finite resources and development rationing.