Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

I actually do hope Intel keep their xScale in the Wireless, network, mass storage controller space - because (guess what) they often are specced higher than common or garden ARM processors that are used in PDA's and the like.

The xScale used in the Iyonix (the IOP321) is an Input/Output processor - so actually has rather better PCI support, support for a range of interfaces and functionality that no self respecting PDA driving ARM would require. The successor to the IOP321 - the 332 (covered previously by Drobe) has a lot of bells and whistles that a typical PDA wouldn't have (or need) - such as 800MHz clock rate, support for faster PCI variants with a PCI-Express to PCI-X bridge, faster memory with DDR2 support (even ECC/Error Correction) and an improved interrupt controller.

By contrast the ARM9 is anemic, probably hitting around the performance level of a StrongARM (ah back to 1995 again - wonderful). Intel currently *do* actually produce and release the fastest ARM processors *and* the fact these processors are intended for high speed coms/networking or mass storage should be seen as a big PLUS because the performance demanded of them (and acchieved by them) is somewhat better than StrongARM, ARM9 or other PDA drivers. The IOP range have more relaxed power budgets (they don't have to be battery powered), they do communicate with faster devices than a PDA would ever need to so the interfaces provided are more in line with what one would expect of a desktop processor (or as close to one as we're likely to see in ARM format for the foreseeable future).

Given the frugality of RISC OS the performance the user experiences often exceeds what the raw MHz figure would suggest. Yes these (IOP) processors are not targetted at the home market - but do they need to be if (after all) the role as I/O processors become more demanding to the point where these ARM's become virtually desktop processors in all but name ?

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 5/11/04 7:01PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page


Reporting user / IP: /
Comment GID: 12801
Timestamp: Thu, 23 May 2019 12:41:34 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Star Fighter 3000: The Next Generation review
    Star Fighter 3000: The Next Generation was born from the 3D0 version of the original SF3K that was ported back to RISC OS and this year freed from programmers' hard discs for the platform to enjoy, writes Andrew Weston. In this review Andrew weighs up much-improved graphics and sound against playability and stability.
     19 comments, latest by AW on 9/12/08 8:45PM. Published: 17 Nov 2008

  • Random article

  • Qercus front cover and Vantage
    There's always an explanation
     9 comments, latest by Q on 17/5/04 3:16PM. Published: 12 May 2004

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "You mean the Drobe website is brain-damaged by design?"
    Page generated in 0.0648 seconds.