Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

nx said >"Lots of users/people seem to think that they know ROL has used Select subscribers money to fund the development of the A9. It is quite possible that advantage6 have funded ROL for their time and effort. Lets give ROL the benefit of doubt shall we?"

But... it was ROL who said that they might produce Select for Iyonix and said so more than once. Some Iyonix users *did* take out or keep up subscriptions - so what did *they* get for the money they spent - where *did* their money go ?

nx said > "Also, many people seem to think that ROL should bend over backwards to develop Select for Iyonix. Users knew when they purchased their Iyonix that the OS was developed by Castle - Not ROL. So why should they expect ROL spend a lot of their effort on supporting another companies OS when they already have many thousands of users of RO 4.xx to support first? "

Yes I bought an Iyonix - I knew it did not have any immediate prospect of it at that time (or possibly *ever*) running select. I have *no* problem with that and at this stage am not pushed about it - but here's the rub *some* Iyonix users *did* keep up or take out Select subscriptions because at some point ROL hinted that that would be a Select ported to the Iyonix.

If ROL then or now had *no* intention of supporting Iyonix - fine they should have said that. If it was the case that technical reasons prevented it fine - they could say that too. Point is they *did not* - that's where the problem lies. From time to time ROL "hint" that they might support Iyonix then change their minds or put it lower on their list of priorities. That's (IMHO) is what is causing the problem - if peoples' expectations are raised then dashed that's what causes problems.

At this point the best thing I would suggest Iyonix users could do is buy software from vendors who support Iyonix and avoid those that don't. At least then the money that's spend *will* benefit that platform rather than money spend on Select Subscriptions that *don't*.

 is a RISC OS UserAMS on 23/9/05 1:25PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page


Reporting user / IP: /
Comment GID: 16762
Timestamp: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 05:30:50 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Archive booklets review part one
    MessengerPro, VirtualRPC, simple networking and programming guides
     20 comments, latest by jlavallin on 19/12/05 3:28PM. Published: 12 Dec 2005

  • Random article

  • New TEK 1608 screenshots and development news

     Discuss this. Published: 22 Feb 2001

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Who cares? I, for one, rarely go to drobe..."
    Page generated in 0.0538 seconds.