Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

Hmm. I don't agree that whether something is proprietary or 'open' is actually the salient point. I'd argue that actually the relevant point is whether the format is appropriate and necessary. If I can't read a format I don't really care whether it is open or not. I certainly don't think that would change the childishness quotient. (Sending as plain text, however, may well do.)

Does Open Office even have a RISC OS version?

In any case... Lets look at the possibilities and probable outcomes when dealing with someone who sends inappropriately formated files you can't read.

1) Run around and try to read them. Reply in text files. Probably most people can read word files on other peoples computers, and probably most people would fold like umbrellas and follow this method. However, the bureaucrat won't even know there is a problem. 2) Send a [polite] message asking for the same information in any of the formats you think would be useful. Probable outcome : bureaucrat disregards, or conveniently loses, or forgets to do so, or just gets annoyed and considers the information served. 3) (1), but also (2) regarding future correspondence - bureaucrat disregards your polite message - after all, you managed to read it didn't you, so why put themselves out? 4) (1) but reply in a form you find convenient and suspect they won't (either proprietary or 'open'; it doesn't make any difference to the recipient who can't read it). Now they definitely get annoyed, but presumably also get your point. 5) (3), then (4) on subsequent correspondence.

Now I don't know anything extra about Tarquin's case, even whether he was receiving Word files from them, but if he's done (5) then it may well be the only way to actually get the point across. Whether it is worth doing when being sued I'm not going to judge.

 is a RISC OS UserLoris on 23/3/06 6:14PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page

Details

Reporting user / IP: / 3.228.24.192
Comment GID: 18686
Timestamp: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 19:21:10 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Jan Vibe: The interview
    The man, the myth, the BASIC graphics master
     9 comments, latest by harmsy on 17/8/07 3:50PM. Published: 11 Aug 2007

  • Random article

  • drobe.co.uk pilfers elusive Omega
    Mine! All mine! And we have the photos to prove it
     17 comments, latest by EPDM on 3/4/03 12:07AM. Published: 30 Mar 2003

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "I must put drobe.co.uk on the blacklist of UN USER FRIENDLY ACORN WEBSITES"
    Page generated in 0.0533 seconds.