Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

To understand the rift between RISC OS Ltd and Castle you have to understand the motivations and personalities of the individuals involved.

In his book 'Accidental Empires: How the Boys of Silicon Valley Make Their Millions, Battle Foreign Competition and Still Can't Get a Date' [link] (well worth a read), Robert X Cringely writes about the how the pioneers of personal computing (Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Nolan Bushnell at Atari etc) were driven by a need to have absolute control of their respective platforms. In much the same way, there are people at ROL and Castle to whom it is very important to be at the centre of the RISC OS universe, regardless of how small that universe actually is. To them the RISC OS codebase is an immensely valuable asset and to share any part of it is unthinkable.

Considering ROL and Castle are businesses, it's suprising how unbusinesslike the behaviour of their managers sometimes is. One example would be Paul Middleton not bothering to hire a solicitor specialising in contract law when drawing up ROL's licensing agreement with Pace or later on when ROL were initially in dispute with Castle because he thought he was smart enough not to need one. Another would be Peter Wild's belief that no-one would notice if Castle violated the GPL.

Understanding this, it is very unlikely that ROL and Castle will ever be able to co-operate, even if it is what their users want (which it is) and their survival depends on it (which it does).

 is a RISC OS UserWill! on 2/7/06 12:14AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page

Details

Reporting user / IP: / 35.153.135.60
Comment GID: 19814
Timestamp: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:12:09 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • RISC OS Adjust Review
    What it says on the tin
     30 comments, latest by nunfetishist on 17/6/04 5:54PM. Published: 4 Jun 2004

  • Random article

  • October usergroup action
    Networking, Cino, spam, emulation and more
     12 comments, latest by markee174 on 21/10/03 5:44PM. Published: 19 Oct 2003

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "I've been attributed with things I didn't say on drobe in an attempt to stir the pot with this situation"
    Page generated in 0.0571 seconds.