Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

@AMS: The reason I supported the Omega, was that in its finished state it would have offered a hell lot more processing power than any standard PC workstation (through the use of user-programmable FPGA-space) and back then we might have stood a chance to turn that into native software development. Now we are long past that point. The only way we can hope to get back to a state where RISC OS might be considered a fully-featured desktop/workstation computing platform, is by utilising the vast amount of open-source code out there and stick RISC OS frontends on it. The main problem with this approach is the lack of processing power to run all of this highly-abstracted code and the fact, that a lot of the speed-optimized open-source code is optimized for x86. Don't get me wrong, I still like ARM a lot, but I don't think that we can get by with ARM-only machines, we will need x86-CPUs as well, and we need an API and hardware abstraction layer to make use of them within RISC OS. This way we could integrate the x86 into all popular RISC OS machines in different ways: RiscPC: make use of the second processor. Omega and Iyonix: x86-PCI-cards. PCs: ARM code would be run through emulation or on a ARM-PCI-card, x86 code would be run on the host processor.

@all: The most important reason why RISC OS must become open source software to survive as a desktop platform, is that no-one in their right mind would invest into it in its current state, simply because its future is so uncertain. The reason why Windows and Linux are so successful, is that there is a guaranteed future for the two. If my company decides to invest in Linux or Windows, it is safe to say, that this investment will not become worthless through discontinuation of the development of the underlying hardware or the operating system. The same can not be said for RISC OS, not even if it becomes open source. But if it was open source, companies would at least have the guarantee, that they could implement missing features and fix existing bugs themselves, if official development should cease.

 is a RISC OS UserJGZimmerle on 19/08/06 9:48PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page


Reporting user / IP: /
Comment GID: 25891
Timestamp: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:57:58 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • The Editor's Decision is Final - Part One
    We kick off a new series of lighthearted news coverage with some articles which didn't quite make it to your screens
     6 comments, latest by peprice on 4/8/01 5:11PM. Published: 1 Aug 2001

  • Random article

  • PNG developers kit from RISCOS Ltd.
    Released exclusively to Select users
     12 comments, latest by moss on 3/10/02 5:22PM. Published: 2 Oct 2002

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Leave young upstarts with a monopoly and you can easily end up with a badly focussed view of the world"
    Page generated in 0.0601 seconds.