Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

Theres no need to get snippy. I think my basic point has remained constant - although I concede I may have different assumptions, leading to my glossing over different areas.[0]

I also take your point about the reduction in prevalance of ROS users. I don't think that affects my underlying argument though. Let me try to put it another way though, and see if you agree.

* 'Many' OSes are capable of being compiled for different architectures.[1] * However, in practice, for commodity OSes [2] at any one point in time, there will be a single preferred architecture.[3] This is demonstrated by Macs migration from one architecture to another. This is a support issue at several levels[4]. * There don't seem to be the resources to make ROS easily portable. * As architectures vary in relative power and the current leader may in a sense be maxing out, it may be wise to try to target where general processing power increases are to be had.

I you read my previous posts carefully I think you'll see this position in them. I'm not saying that it wouldn't be nice to have completely portable sources for ROS. Just that it isn't necessarily something to panic about.

[0] I may also be wrong of course, but humour me.. [1] Yes yes I know, although most of those are UNIX. Also note I'm writing about practice, not theory. [2] Windows, Macs, RISC OS, (perhaps) Amiga OS etc.. [3] This needn't be the case, even for proprierary software, if a secure universal system of compilation on installation existed. Obviously this system would itself need to be portable. [4] not just (third party?) developers as you imply. Hardware is affected by the CPU. To give a far-reaching example, RAM requirements vary dependent on code density.

 is a RISC OS UserLoris on 02/09/06 11:07AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page


Reporting user / IP: /
Comment GID: 25994
Timestamp: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:48:32 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Select preview
    Every feature in Select 1 covered, what's in, what's out, what's it look like and what do we think of it?
     9 comments, latest by diomus on 15/3/03 1:10AM. Published: 31 Oct 2001

  • Random article

  • Multimedia-friendly 1GHz XScale launched
    For the love of God, get this chip a RISC OS port
     26 comments, latest by Phantomz on 7/5/07 10:49PM. Published: 22 Apr 2007

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "'Only the truly memorable stunts are worth a write up'. So, what sort of memorable 'stunt' might be worth a write up?"
    Page generated in 0.0793 seconds.