Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

mrchocky: Would you not consider running the OS natively on hardware that's available off the shelf, costs much less and is many times more powerful a benefit? Plus having hundreds of millions of potential customers that don't need to buy different hardware or an emulator to run the OS seems to me a real benefit for the platform. Running the OS on an emulator in my opinion undermines the system's credibility, what other operating systems are run on an emulator? Outdated legacy operating systems for the most part. People will NOT convert (maybe a handful) to using an OS that requires an emulator to run - they will continue to use the host OS and possibly use the emulated OS for very specific tasks until a similar application has been developed for the host OS.

mavch: "RISC OS runs on them" - hmm, RISC OS actually runs on x86 and now PowerPC as well - albeit via emulation but people claim that it's actually faster than the "real thing" "They use less power" - Does that really matter? Not in laptops as ARM based laptops aren't exactly filling stores and homes! As has been pointed out many times, video cards and hard discs are the main culprits in modern computers - not the processor. Plus you can use a Pentium Mobile processor that's not so far above the XScale in power consumption that people actually care. "They're quieter and more reliable due to no CPU fans." - a definite and huge advantage. "They're easier to program in machine code." - Does this really make the slightest difference any more? Does anyone outside RISC OS program in machine code for desktop machines (other than OS of course)? "They're not evolved from 25 year old designs and therefore not (as) full of hacks." - But still the 25 year old design (which is actually closer to 30 years) is faster, cheaper and more readily available so what is the actual benefit here? "They're simpler and therefore more understandable." - Who actually cares? If the system works and is cheaper I can't see people giving a hoot. "They don't have a BIOS" - Just the CMOS instead. Not the same, I know but no system is perfect and the ARM based hardware is no gods gift to people.

 is a RISC OS UserGulli on 23/08/05 00:00AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page


Reporting user / IP: /
Comment GID: 26764
Timestamp: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:25:00 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Review: A9home v. Koolu
    Clash of the tiniest
     31 comments, latest by polas on 18/10/07 6:03PM. Published: 15 Oct 2007

  • Random article

  • Writing internationalised software
    John-Mark Bell dives into the nitty-gritty of Unicode and writing RISC OS software for users worldwide
     4 comments, latest by caliston2 on 13/4/05 2:04PM. Published: 13 Apr 2005

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "As their reports are full of errors, [omissions] and mis-reporting - so readers you have been warned... unfortunately Drobe articles cannot be taken at face value"
    Page generated in 0.0644 seconds.