Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

dgs: "In both cases, the users concerned were moving for reasons of features, support and supportability, not underlying technical aspects of the operating system concerned."

I did say "a crucial reason" rather than "the crucial reason", but agreed: if you have an operating system based on DOS which then has a ton of support libraries for doing GUIs, threading and the like, then the availability of such stuff, no matter how nastily it's done, overcomes the limitations of the underlying platform; this makes the platform easier for people to develop for and delivers a potentially better user experience as more and nicer stuff is made for the platform. I bet Netscape 1.x and successors could have run on RISC OS, too, had there been library support to make the porting bearable.

Another factor is price, availability and hardware support - moving off NeXT or RISC OS hardware onto something moderately inexpensive almost always involved generic Intel-based PC kit, and until Microsoft made the big push into the "consumer market" with their NT-based operating systems, there wasn't that much available kit for that market running NT. That said, NT4 and successors have been available on laptops for years, but I suppose the "consumer market" demanded pretty icons rather than the improved stability that those operating systems offered.

markee174: "Apple had to abandon its update to Mac OS 9 (Rhapsody) and effectively put the MAC OS on top of NextSteps Darwin core."

A pragmatic business decision and, for once, a sensible one from Steve Jobs (disregarding the confusion around Rhapsody, which was derived from NeXTStep as well - you're thinking of Copland which probably deserves a vapourware status comparable to Galileo). I still don't get the claim that "nothing has really changed", though, when all evidence suggests that everything apart from RISC OS has.

 is a RISC OS Userguestx on 04/03/04 11:50AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page


Reporting user / IP: /
Comment GID: 28204
Timestamp: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:08 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • RISC OS in schools today
    RISC OS powered special school recognised
     45 comments, latest by harmsy on 21/02/05 4:58PM. Published: 12 Feb 2005

  • Random article

  • Be Lured by Lua
    All about RiscLua.
     11 comments, latest by mrchocky on 1/2/03 6:22PM. Published: 30 Jan 2003

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "'Only the truly memorable stunts are worth a write up'. So, what sort of memorable 'stunt' might be worth a write up?"
    Page generated in 0.0766 seconds.