Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

It would appear that you've woefully misinterpreted Michael's email.

Moving common functionality (such as full save, page searching, textareas, treeviews, scrollbar widgets, etc) into the cross-platform core is the correct thing to do to reduce the effort required to produce a platform frontend.

As part of this process, APIs get redesigned to be significantly more sane. A great deal of the RISC OS-specific code makes assumptions which do not hold in the core of NetSurf (which has to be portable).

The result of these API changes, along with other, less obvious, differences is that the existing platform frontends then require fixing to work with the new core functionality. Unfortunately, there's been nobody to do this for the RISC OS frontend for the last 2.5 years. During that time, any such fixes have generally been made by Michael or myself.

I have reached the point where I can no longer commit significant amounts of time to fixing the RISC OS frontend -- what time I do spend on NetSurf (and, for the avoidance of doubt, I've written the best part of 50,000 lines of code in the last year or so) gets spent on improving the core engine.

Therefore, we have a choice:

1) Continue to perpetuate the myth that the RISC OS frontend is actively supported. 2) Ask for someone to come along and maintain the RISC OS frontend. 3) Remove the RISC OS frontend from NetSurf as it's getting in the way of necessary changes for the long-term good of the browser.

As I've explained, option 1 is no longer viable. This leaves options 2 and 3, which Michael's email outlines.

Our preference is clearly 2 -- dropping support for any platform is not a decision we take lightly. However, when it gets to the point where progress is being hindered, difficult decisions have to be made.

 is a RISC OS Userjmb on 6/8/09 10:32PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page


Reporting user / IP: /
Comment GID: 31352
Timestamp: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:37:18 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Cerilica's Vantage reviewed
    Is it the next killer app? Will we give it the thumbs up or the thumbs down?
     3 comments, latest by Alexander on 5/11/02 6:44PM. Published: 28 Sep 2001

  • Random article

  • South West show news
    RISC OS goings on in the West Country
     29 comments, latest by lproven on 8/3/04 3:45AM. Published: 28 Feb 2004

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "I'm not sure I could have trusted you six months ago"
    Page generated in 0.0835 seconds.