Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Confirm comment report request

I'm not sure it's wise to enter this debate but here goes.

The Iyonix problem referred to in the main story is not an issue of completeness, it's an issue of some faulty machines. The nature of the fault is intermittent, though exacerbated in certain circumstances. There has been a process of refining those circumstances to reproduce the fault more frequently; this is a standard technique for dealing with intermittent problems that are otherwise very time-consuming to solve.

The number of machines affected is unclear (to the general reader of the Iyonix Smartgroup at least). I presume that someone with a badly affected machine would return it to Castle for repair/replacement/refund. No-one has said that they've done this, though I wouldn't read too much into that since they might regard it as a private matter.

My machine, I'm pleased to say, has shown none of the problem symptoms. This *seems* to be the experience of the large majority of active posters to the group. Equally, the machine has been 'complete', in terms of the promised spec, since day one (mine is over a year old now). It has got a lot faster and slightly more capable as Castle have onward developed it but I don't see that as completeness.

I can't comment on the Omega personally but it would seem from the Press that it had some features mssing at launch; that would be a completeness issue. Presumably that has either been resolved now or owners are content to wait for its resolution. If they're not, and they've been sold a product that does not match its description, then they have the same right to a replacement or refund. Surely this is not relevant to the Iyonix mod-programme?

 is a RISC OS UserTonyStill on 31/1/04 7:02PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Click on the button below to confirm you wish to flag up this comment to the website's administrators. Abuse of this service will be frowned upon and it should only be used to notify us of comments that are extremely distasteful, indecent or otherwise unlawful. If you disagree with an opinion expressed or fact stated in a comment, please take part in the debate rather than expect it to be removed.

Return to the drobe.co.uk front page

Details

Reporting user / IP: / 3.226.251.81
Comment GID: 8609
Timestamp: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:22:43 +0000

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Running RISC OS Programs on Linux
    Peter Naulls contemplates the possibilities
     17 comments, latest by drjones69 on 6/6/05 11:17AM. Published: 31 Mar 2005

  • Random article

  • News in brief
    Good bye RISC OS 4.02, software news and some laughs
     18 comments, latest by simo on 3/7/05 5:43PM. Published: 28 Jun 2005

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Your fellow contributor to Drobe seems to have a personal dislike of anything that does not come from Castle"
    Page generated in 0.0684 seconds.