jess
28/7/04 7:15PM |
It looks very nice.
It would be lovely if it didn't involve XP.
W2K version? Linux-Wine version? |
Revin Kevin
28/7/04 7:27PM |
I agree it looks good.
And good for Advantage six, they seem to get more and more products for other than normal use. |
nunfetishist (+0.5)
28/7/04 7:28PM |
One assumes this is more of a tablet-PC than a PDA? |
Q (+0.4)
28/7/04 8:20PM |
To nunfetishist:
I'd appreciate definitions that distinguish between tablet & PDA.
Advantage Six seem to have taken up the description of sub-notebook/super-PDA from our forthcoming review but those of us who have had access to the machine have been unable to give a simple description.
|
Gulli (+1.1)
28/7/04 8:48PM |
Quite simple actually - TabletPC is basically a laptop without keyboard or mouse but has a touchscreen instead. TabletPC FAQ:
http://www.tabletpctalk.com/faqs/faq.shtml |
bluenose (+0.1)
28/7/04 10:03PM |
Looks another good product from STD.
I do like the comment on the website:
"Non-emulated (ARM-based) modules are
not available at this time"
Seems to imply that perhaps a A5 type
product running RISCOS natively may be
in the offering or am I reading too
much into this and the STD statement
about certain undertakings by Castle?
|
atimmins (+1.6)
28/7/04 10:47PM |
And for those folks who can't wait for STD to release this to the general public... Go get your own ECS (Elitegroup) EZ-Tablet EZ30D TabletPC at:
[Link: www.europc.co.uk]
A snip at £915 (Inc. VAT). |
TonyStill (+0.1)
28/7/04 10:51PM |
Well I'm still hoping that Castle's references to PDAs (in the recent press conference and elsewhere) might lead to a native machine. There are a variety of XScale-powered PDAs out there now; these have the benefits of being both cheaper and being ARM-powered.
Here's hoping. |
Sawadee
29/7/04 12:44AM |
It looks nice.
Not really sure I like the idea about touch screen in place of keyboard/mouse. My school issued XP Windows Pro laptop I find not nice to use it's touch pad mouse for too long, rather annoying I feel so I am getting a USB mouse for it.
I also have a new JetFlash portable storage device (USB plugIn 60Mb storage about the size of a disposable cigarette lighter) with my new XP laptop, but I now have to look into getting USB fitted to my RO4. Is there RO4 software available for my JetFlash to read it if I plug it into RO4 USB port?
I think the same as *Tony's* comments, and I'm hoping for a native laptop machine.
Regards, Steve. |
simo (+0.1)
29/7/04 1:10AM |
Hehe, the good thing about all this emulation is that you don't need to write RISC OS drivers etc for anything - it just uses the WindowsXP stuff, like being able to rotate a screen by 90 degrees, or deal with two port replicators.
Which is the same reason I doubt we'd see a Win2K/Linux/native version of this Jess..... |
flypig (+1.6)
29/7/04 1:29AM |
Looks like an interesting development and potentially neat product. I wonder if the camera will be useable from the RISC OS side? (I guess I should probably read the preview to find this out!).
Also, how is the touch screen used on the RISC OS side, without the "three button" action that you'd expect? Is there a virtual keyboard (or perhaps handwriting recognition  )? |
jess (+1.5)
29/7/04 9:23AM |
In reply to simo:
I just hope it's not as poor as the XP tablets we got at work. |
Q
29/7/04 11:08AM |
For Jess:
Tell me the problems you have with the tablets at work and I'll see if I can check them out on the A5. I've got a little more time before our review goes to print. |
jess (+0.1)
29/7/04 1:05PM |
Slow login to domain.
Unreliable wireless networking.
poor plug and play on docking station.
choosing portraitlandscape incorrectly.
various display problems - wrong mode on start-up
OS corruption and recovery disks not working.
The hardware itself seems less unreliable than typical PC laptops.
|
piemmm
29/7/04 2:50PM |
"Slow login to domain."
That is not the fault of the hardware. And your other claims seem dubious as well. Maybe it is time to read the user manual? |
simo
29/7/04 4:58PM |
In reply to piemmm:
I think Jess is faulting WinXP more than the hardware. |
piemmm
29/7/04 5:07PM |
"I think Jess is faulting WinXP more than the hardware."
Ok then, lets try again:
"Slow login to domain."
That is not the fault of the hardware, or the software. You have it setup wrong or your domain model is hopelessly wrong. And I can say this having done the MCSE track. |
piemmm
29/7/04 7:26PM |
Yes, I am willing to make a good guess that you're using roaming profiles and when someone logs into your wired workstation on your nice fast network they get all their profile downloaded to them in seconds (the profile will include crap like documents, IE cache, etc).
Of course, on a tablet with WiFi it is a completley different kettle of fish. You have no nice fast connection.
That would be one of many factors that would make things slow, another would be the fact that WiFi networks do not let directed broadcasts through, unless in bridged mode (which is very highly unlikely), and thus if you have a multiple domain controllers (PDC, then lots of BDCs) then your poor tablet has to go find one (this is where #PRE and #DOM in lmhosts files come in handy).
Another one could be the way you have WINS configured on your network. More than likely you have all your clients setup to be simple broadcast node types (which is bad) rather than hybrid (0x8) and have a working wins server.
Anyway, thats enough of the free advice. My pizza is getting cold. |
jess
29/7/04 8:15PM |
Some users are using roaming profiles, most aren't. Some of the tablets were used wired anyway, in docking stations. The windows 2000 laptops are on wi-fi too. Wins comment is interesting, but would surely be the same for 2K? |
druck (+1.5)
30/7/04 10:19AM |
Instead putting more money in Microsofts pocket, with an emulator sticking plaster over the designed for Windows logo, STD who are a well respected hardware company should be looking to team up with parnters to take advantage of the increasing number of ARM based devices which can run RISC OS natively. Take this [Link: www.theregister.co.uk] for example, an ideal form factor and a company willing to licence its designs after nearly being put out of business by Microsoft. This is what the A5 should be, running RISC OS 5 directly with no inferior, insecure and unreliable Gatesware compromising the entire unit. |
nunfetishist (+1.5)
30/7/04 11:29AM |
In reply to druck:
What a bunch of bigotted, blinkered FUD.
Although I'm still waiting for a Linux version of VirtualAcorn for people who don't want to pay the Windows licence fee. |
NeilWB (+1.5)
30/7/04 12:15PM |
in reply to nunfetishist: "What a bunch of bigotted, blinkered FUD"
Why? Whilst I wouldn't presume to tell STD what products they should be developing, David's proposal, IMHO, would be far better for the RISC OS market.
Neil |
VirtualAcorn (+1.6)
30/7/04 1:05PM |
In reply to druck:
Try reading the article again, the A5 is a "proof of concept" for a customer, not a retail product. Advantage Six (along with a number of others) have discovered that you can use VirtualRPC on pre-existing hardware to show a conecpt to a customer very quickly. |
nunfetishist
30/7/04 2:10PM |
In reply to NeilWB:
I was refering to "inferior, insecure and unreliable Gatesware" |
Stewy
30/7/04 6:12PM |
In reply to druck:
Perhaps you haven't read the preview of the A5 in RISCWorld? Worth a read:
"What is especially exciting is that Advantage 6 are considering doing a version based on an ARM processor running RISC OS natively"
Oooh, here's hoping... |
NeilWB
30/7/04 9:19PM |
In reply to nunfetishist:
Oh. That had slipped by me 
I have to admit Windows XP is a good OS. But it's taken them a bloody long time to get there. Imagine what RISC OS might be now if Acorn were in the same position as Microsoft - that's what really irks I guess.
Neil |
AMS
31/7/04 2:43PM |
nunfetishist> But Windows is inferior (in terms of use), insecure (as are parts of it such as IE which an american security organisation (CERT) has advised people not to use) and unreliable (that one is from experience - and if you need further proof just go to MS's own website and look up any of the myriad of service packs/releases (they use the word CRITICAL and it does mean something after all)).
In reply to Stewy:
As to Advantage6 releasing an ARM based version why are they shooting themselves in the foot by releasing a Windows based one first (surely that would reduce the market for their ARM based one). I suspect this is just a "throwaway" line to encourage people to buy the Windows version now because (in some unspecified way) it may help have an ARM based unit released.
How hum nice to see everyone is back at trying to kill off the RISC OS platform again (hey what changes then ?).
Regards
Annraoi |
| 3 comment(s) are below your moderation threshold. Login to view them. |
| Use the forum for more comments on this article |
