nunfetishist
30/7/04 7:28PM |
Out of interest, is PCI Express asymetric? If so, does this new CPU provide device or host support? Or both? |
simo
30/7/04 10:02PM |
"Software compatible"? So could this be a plug-in replacement for the 600MHz chip in the Iyonix?
I don't think PCI-X is that important, heck we barely have any PCI cards yet! |
nunfetishist (+1.5)
30/7/04 10:09PM |
In reply to simo:
It'd have to be pin-compatible, as well as software compatible for it to be a plug-in replacement  |
Jaco
30/7/04 10:28PM |
The only way to plug it in the Iyonix is when it is on a PCI board!
Which would be a nice idea but then software is needed to take it in use. |
JGZimmerle
31/7/04 9:16AM |
PCI-X is not the same as PCI-Express. |
jess
31/7/04 9:35AM |
So how feasible would it be to use a raid card based on this chip as a processor card for a new RISC OS system? |
nunfetishist
31/7/04 10:17AM |
In reply to jess:
Depends on the RAID card. But it's doubtful, I imagine. Most of the RAID cards that'll actually tell you how to talk to them don't use a specific CPU, but a big load of custom chips. That and it'd prolly be cheaper to roll your own PCI card with the CPU on it and nothing else at that point. |
Spriteman
31/7/04 11:11AM |
Why are we putting this on a PCI card? Surely we'd rather CTL put it on a Iyonix mobo even if the speed increase is only modest.
--
Spriteman |
cynic (+1.6)
31/7/04 12:09PM |
CTL would presumably have to put this in a new Iyonix mobo. I suppose the question is how much of a redesign would be necessary and would the benefits be worth it.
A speed increase of 25-30% might not be that impressive to those who already have an Iyonix but would be an extra plus for those who have not yer made the leap to 32bit. |
mrchocky (+3.1)
31/7/04 12:12PM |
An IOP331/332 based Iyonix would be up to twice as fast as the original Iyonix due to resolution of bus performance issues in the 321. The board redesign would be considerable. |
cynic
31/7/04 5:07PM |
Well that certainly sounds worth it!
Depends on the costs though. |
Clades
1/8/04 9:31AM |
the addition of PCI-Express wouldn't make any difference to Iyonix owners unless you wanted to upgrade the video card in 10 years time. Come to think of it, this is RISC OS hardware we're talking about 
PCIe cards are very expensive too. A humble 33MHz PCI card is fine for most non-3D uses.
Only up to 800MHz? 200MHz increase in several years is a poor growth. I bet they would overclock like mad with a good heatsink though. |
md0u80c9 (+1.5)
1/8/04 6:43PM |
In reply to Clades:
I disagree. The problem you get won't be upgrades, its spares and repairs.
Imagine if your GeForce card dies. It's PCI, not even AGP. You can't buy them in the shops (even buying one without the modifications would be tricky). They've dried up in retail, but they'll probably dry up in trade terms too, so you'll have to rely upon the stocks that Castle have.
Once supplies dry up, you can't sell the machines unless you find a suitable replacement - this is why RiscPCs are no longer for sale. Frankly, PCI video cards will probably be second-hand only very soon because their bandwidth is insufficient.
AGP would be good, but it's now also an obsolete technology.
One benefit of PCI-Express is that it's a new technology, it should be around for a while. Bandwidth is always useful, but probably wouldn't be utilised fully on RISC OS for a while.
Expense? Yes, I agree it's an issue this month. However, once PCI-express cards become commonplace, PCI kit will be the more expensive. ATi have just produced the X600 budget graphics card, which is sub-100UKP, no doubt nVIDIA will follow suit.
More worrying for me would be ATA. Serial ATA /is/ now commonplace; new PC mobos are dropping parallel ATA interfaces fairly quickly. We would do better employing Serial ATA interfaces, and running them in parallel-ATA emulation mode. |
NoMercy
2/8/04 2:17AM |
X300 seriese cards can be bought for under £60 inc vat, which is a true budget card but it's new and does support all the features if not at the same speed as the higher end cards.
Intels latest southbridge I believe is connected to the northbridge by PCIe, so it shouln't be to dificult if other manufacturers take up this idea to plug PC issue southbridges (with there intergrated SATA controllers) into an X-Scale.
I think it's a nice chip, but I would suspect the podule interface to disapear if it was used, though if PCI support is droped completely or a southbridge with intergrated PCI brige used, the 'large' chip count of the board could be reduced and a smaller, likely cheaper and faster machine produced, though I doubt we'll see DDR2 as it's a nightmare for board designers :/ |
hubersn
2/8/04 10:41AM |
Actually, I can still buy rather a lot of PCI graphic cards in shops all over Germany. Since they are still available as retail products here, I imagine that supply will last a few more years without major problems.
It is interesting to see that several companies still produce PCI variants of fairly recent graphics technology - AOpen and Gainward both sell GeForce FX5200 based products including DVI and TV-Out.
PCI Express would be surely a good idea anyway, and if recent southbridges are available to connect via PCI Express, this is a major step forward for the RISC OS market, since the availability of plain PCI southbridges with an up-to-date feature set is a much bigger problem than the availability of PCI graphic cards! |
NoMercy
2/8/04 12:59PM |
Well wherever I got the information about the North-Southbridge being PCIe was incorect, digging around all I can find is Intel have MCI and IHA/AHA, Via the V-link, and SiS there MuTIOLR, oh gotta love that propitary setup :/
Guess I can just carry on with the wishful thinking, but even if people ignore the idea of using a common open standard to connect the chips together were likely to see lots of PCIe based controllers appear over the next few years, though it wouln't help the chip count much having a dedicated chip for every extra function needed sighs soz for the missleading info there. |
| |
Around this time last month, the online tech press began covering news of 