32bit Adjust on ARM9 breakthrough - RISC OS News, Software and Information

32bit Adjust on ARM9 breakthrough

Published: 8th Oct 2004, 15:00:09GMT Source: drobe.co.uk
By Chris Williams

Page 1 of 1

This is not a drill [Updated]

Advantage Six has announced the A9 - an ARM9 powered computer that runs a 32bit version of 'Embedded RISC OS Adjust'. The A9 press release is light on the details, so we're awaiting a fuller specification and expected shipping dates, although we're told that a retail version will be made available at some point.

Earlier this week, RISCOS Ltd. confirmed the development of a 32bit RISC OS Select. Previously, RISC OS 4 could only run natively on ARM processors that provided a 26bit program counter, and as modern CPU cores provide only 32bit program counters, the OS would need to be made 32bit compatible in order to survive.

ARM9 and RISC OS 4

The ARM9 processor family used by the A9 tends to run between 180 and 250MHz, and basically focuses on being high performance embedded cores, rather than desktop brutes. The main point here is that RISC OS together with a hardware partner has found a new processor and solution space to leverage itself onto. Going by their announcement today, we're assuming they want to move into 'industrial control'.

What we do know is that the A9 will be available as a rack mountable version and also, interestingly, in a wall mountable version with a flatscreen and mobile communications capabilities. We also know that Advantage Six, better known as STD to RISC OS users, are using the RISC OS friendly user environment and BASIC language to sell the system to engineers in need of rapid solution development.

As to the difference between Embedded RISC OS and desktop RISC OS, Ad6 explain: "Embedded versions of RISC OS 4 have exactly the same potential features as the full desktop versions but leave the choice of which features are to be included to the manufacturer, dependant on the end application and target cost."

Stop press at 14:51 8/10/2004
Matt Edgar of STD tells us that as for what ARM9 processor they'll use: "We have a range available to us and will, in conjuction with the OEMs decide on the most suitable for their particular requirement. This is why we have a range of processors/boards available. Some of which are very capable. We have identified a number of initial market areas that we are concentrating on but expect to expand rapidly into others as we demonstrate that we can deliver (reference customers are an important part of this). Obviously details beyond what is in the press release are commercially sensitive."

Also, expected OEM prices for "reasonable quantities" are 400 to 1500GBP. Sample units of the machine are available now, and finalised units will ship depending on the OEMs' requirements, we're told.

Update at 19:43 8/10/2004
drobe.co.uk was able to speak to Castle this evening, and we were able to get their opinion of events. "It's fantastic news", said Castle director Jack Lillingston, "we're always keen to see new RISC OS products in the marketplace". Castle reaffirmed their support and enthusiasm for all things RISC OS, noting that they're keen to see as much deployment of RISC OS as possible, as such things ultimately help RISC OS users and Castle themselves. The 32-bit Adjust developments are of course between ROL and STD, and do not directly involve RISC OS 5 technology or Castle.

Speaking on the matter of the relationship between Castle and RISCOS Ltd, Jack spoke highly of the progress being made with Paul Middleton over the negotiations between RISC OS 5 and Select, stating that the agreement was "99% complete", and that we should expect a joint announcement in the next while.

Links
A9 press release
A9 website
RISCOS Ltd

This article has been linked to, or is available in the following formats:

[Printable] [Digg this] [Blog search]

Rien 8/10/04 3:44PM	Hoping this means we will get some form of portable RISC OS mini-machine coming now? Rien
blahsnr 8/10/04 3:47PM	Cool two versions of 32bit happy (presumably hardware independent) RISC OS to choose from Bit ironic after all the mud that was thrown Castle's way about them doing lots of work for the embedded market during the 'big spat' to find out that ROL are doing exactly the same. Is this now a sign of ROL's waning commitment to their 'core desktop market' or just the reality-check that anyone developing RISC OS as an OS will have to expand into non-desktop areas to take the OS forwards.
blahsnr (+0.1) 8/10/04 3:58PM	Rien I enquired sometime ago about RON, to hear from PM that ROL were considering the netBook Pro after having failed to get a port for the netBook. After a couple of emails PM then said he couldn't comment any further. Wacky-backy or an NDA? Who knows Doubtless the next RISC OS show will be interesting!
Rien 8/10/04 4:04PM	Maybe the emebdded RISC OS Select IS a coop between castle and RISC OS??
blahsnr 8/10/04 4:08PM	Rien Are you by any chance in a (Dutch) coffee shop at the moment
Rien 8/10/04 4:12PM	No, but I am in an optimistic mood... Rien
mrchocky 8/10/04 4:20PM	The NetbookPro has a variety of crazy hardware that unfortunately don't make it a great choice to port RISC OS to.
jc (-0.1) 8/10/04 4:34PM	To Rien, I'm not following your logic. I can't see Castle being the main partner with embedded-32 and letting Advantage Six get the first bite at the cherry! Clearly A6 are the partners with ROL on this embedded version and Castle have been - are - will be partners in an Iyonix version. Great news for everybody!
hzn 8/10/04 6:22PM	So ROL finally did what they set out to do when they started off with ROL - a 32 bit RISC OS. What a waste since a 32 bit RISC OS is there already... or did they build it on top of Castle RISC OS? Or to put it differently: Do we have two different 32 bit RISC OS threads? Anyhow: Put a battery in the wall mountable A9 with flatscreen and there you might have your Laptop?
sa110 8/10/04 6:44PM	What fab news this is. We might even get a more afordable modern computer than either the Omega or Iyonix (wishful thinking). Can't wait to see the version released for the desktop market. Hzn, wouldn't that then be classed as a Tablet PC?
Rien 8/10/04 6:44PM	Maybe Riscstation can do that for us..
hzn 8/10/04 6:47PM	Affordable? I think I saw UKP 400 - 1500 and I assume for a reasonably fast one you won't be in the lower half of that price range... Guess why I wrote "laptop" and not notebook (can be put on my lap) And then there is the issue with the keyboard... since if the wall mountable one does require a keyboard and mouse it's not a tablet PC either.
AMS (-0.1) 8/10/04 7:02PM	*In reply to jc:* Now this is purely speculation but (to quote STD as reported on Drobe in an article by Chris Williams http://www.drobe.co.uk/riscos/artifact1123.html). It was stated that (with respect to STD re-opening) that this "may be subject to Castle Technology Ltd fulfilling certain obligations in a timely manner." Like (perhaps) supplying a variant of the HAL adjusted to work with the STD ARM9 ? Now that's purely speculation but it seems highly unlikely that after years of foot dragging by ROL that suddenly they have 32bit just after they come to a settlement with Castle. But then that's the marvel of speculation it can mean something or nothing at all.......
sa110 8/10/04 7:05PM	Hzn, perhaps STD and ROL have trumped everone and gone for a computer that requres neither keyboard or mouse, just the power of the brain.
simo 8/10/04 7:08PM	So I wonder if this means that Castle will dump their 32-Bit RO and just move the Iyonix-specifics into A HAL for Adjust-32? Then we can have just one 32-Bit RISC OS, yay! Mind you, even two 32-Bit RO's is probably going to be easier for developers than a 32-Bit and a 26-Bit RO....
AMS (+0.1) 8/10/04 7:29PM	Based on what the update states it appears that Castle have said none of their RO5 technology was used in the A9, assuming the HAL is counted in in that then an unqualified congrats are due then to ROL, well done guys. Glad to see these events have not dimmed Castle's enthusiasm for RISC OS, after all they've given us (pre the A9) the first new (and currently only) 32bit hardware - and all without selling a single Windows License to a RISC OS user either (nice !). As to the A9's upper price of 1500 GBP, if that's the OEM price I dread to think what the retail price will be ! Can't wait to see if the same people who complained about the price of Iyonix will do the same when confronted with a slower ARM9 box at a higher price. Anyway - congrats again ROL nice work guys - keep it up !!!! Regards Annraoi
The Doctor 8/10/04 7:58PM	I wonder if Samsung have actually released that 1.2ghz Arm10 they announced a while ago?
AMS 8/10/04 8:16PM	Sadly not.
sa110 8/10/04 8:21PM	would be great to have RISC OS running on it when they finaly get around to releasing it.
Revin Kevin 8/10/04 8:40PM	Is the GPS they mention Global Positioning Satelite or something else?
jlavallin (+0.1) 8/10/04 8:57PM	I may be wrong but I thought that Pace developed a HAL for an Arm9. Could this be resurfacing?
TonyStill 8/10/04 9:11PM	So if this is really a RO Ltd 32-bit RO (rather than a rebadged Castle one) does it answer the question of what the Omega XScale will use?
JWCR 8/10/04 9:42PM	Does this mean that ARM9 cards might soon be available with Select-32 ROMs as an upgrade for the RiscPC?
The Doctor 8/10/04 9:48PM	What would be the point of that? Select and Adjust are already available for RiscPCs as is a 233mhz Kinetic card upgrade. Cheers!
AndrewDuffell 8/10/04 9:56PM	Are not ARM9s faster?
jmb (+0.1) 8/10/04 10:07PM	Bearing in mind that the RPC was designed for the 50odd MHz ARM8, the fact that it's scaled to a 300MHz StrongARM is fairly good going, I'd say. Given that you don't get the best performance out of a StrongARM in a RPC, what's the point in putting a potentially faster ARM9 chip in there instead? Additionally, where's the commercial incentive to do so? RPCs aren't being made any more (due to lack of available parts).
Ike 8/10/04 10:45PM	To Rien: you wrote: Maybe RiscStation could do that. How about finally paying back the deposit????
JWCR 9/10/04 1:08AM	I was beign sarcastic, given that so many upgrades and modifications have been available for the RPC over the years, that have extended its life way beyond that of contemporary Wintel machines. Should have added a smiley.
AMS (+0.1) 9/10/04 2:47PM	*In reply to Andrew:* ARM9's come in different flavours. Some as slow as 33MHz, others clocked faster. The one depicted at the top of this page is an Atmel AT92RM200 some of which manage around 200Mips performance (putting them in or around StrongARM performance). ARM's site says that some ARM9's manage 300Mips (around Kinetic performance?). Some ARM9's do have the Vector Floating Point (VFP) fitted and can do 200+MFlops (but I am not aware of any RISC OS variant that supports that). And then there's the big inponderable which of the many variants of ARM9 have STD chosen - their webpage does not detail the type or performance. It probably wouldn't make a whole lot of sense fitting an ARM9 to a RPC as (for integer performance) the improvement would - at best - be negligable. If the VFP option were exploited that might be of benefit - but it is not compatible (at the moment) with the FPE (so again unlikely to bring immediate benefit). It is more the principle that ROL can now provide a RISC OS variant for processors currently unsupported and 32bit only that is the significant news and that does open the possibility of using xScale and ARM10 (or ARM11's when they become available). Even at that these would be best exploited in new hardware as some of the performance issues of the RiscPC simply won't be addressed by just changing the processor there are other bottlenecks too....
1 comment(s) are below your moderation threshold. Login to view them.
Use the forum for more comments on this article