stevek (+2.0)
21/4/08 8:01AM |
With many schools moving from Acorn machines to Apple I have always thought that VirtualRiscPC would have a lot of appeal in the education market. Perhaps a bundle targetting schools with discounts a class set and a selection of good educational software might spark some interest. Just thinking out loud here.
I'm not sure if I understand this correctly, but VirtualRiscPC comes with RISC OS 4.39 and so you need to subscribe to RISC OS Select to latest version? I understand that Select is funded by subscribers and I don't want to start a flame war but wouldn't it make sense to include the latest OS?
Aaron is one of those people who has put his heart and soul into RISC OS over many years and I hope it pays off for him. |
markee174 (+1.0)
21/4/08 9:29AM |
The beta version runs really well on the latest Mac hardware and also latest Select works on it. So I'm really looking forward to release version. |
nijinsky (+1.0)
21/4/08 10:11AM |
This is excellent news.
|
nijinsky (+1.0)
21/4/08 10:16AM |
Now if only VRPC (either Mac or Windows) could be run from a memory stick to overcome the One computer limit I'd buy right now. However, having to buy 5 licenses or room-hop is not feasible for me.
But then I've always been asking for this.
Cheers
Bob |
rjek
21/4/08 10:18AM |
nijnsky: Install the TUN/TAP device driver used by things like OpenVPN, create a "virtual" network interface, and make up a MAC address to register VA with? I have no idea if that would work, but you can always try and then return the software under distance selling laws if it doesn't work out  |
sascott (+1.0)
21/4/08 10:23AM |
What wonderful news. Thanks to Graeme and Aaron and the beta testers for their efforts. I'd love to see RISC OS running on a Macbook Air. Anyone tried it yet?
Steve |
arawnsley (+2.0)
21/4/08 10:32AM |
I still fail to see any weight in what comments like nijinsky's hold. You buy a WindowsXP licence for every PC, a MacOS licence for every Mac (although it may seem to be pre-loaded, you're still paying for it). Why would RISC OS be any different? It has never been a free OS. You might as well ask MS or Apple for their OS to do the same (ie. run from a pen drive without activation)! |
cables
21/4/08 10:42AM |
In reply to stevek:
I've never subscribed to Select, but have 4.39 running on two computers: my wife's laptop and my iMac (both VRPC).
This is marvellous news: I've always enjoyed VRPC on the Mac and look forward to making a Mac the main computer. Sorry to say it, but the Iyonix - still the flagship "RISC OS in hardware" computer - is beginning to show its age.
I'm even more disappointed that I can't go to Wakefield now. |
rjek (+4.2)
21/4/08 11:16AM |
In reply to arawnsley:
I seem to recall that Select subscribers are allowed to run Select on any machine they have - does that not include VRPC? Isn't it essentially a "site licence"? If not, perhaps if VA could provide a "site licence" to their emulator, and then sell RISC OS licences seperately? |
hubersn (+1.0)
21/4/08 11:23AM |
In reply to arawnsley:
just compare V-RPC with Windows XP running inside a VMWare virtual machine. See the difference?
Anyway, I am now mostly using Tom Walker's excellent RPCemu which does not have many of the obstructive limitations of V-RPC. |
epistaxsis
21/4/08 11:35AM |
This is one of the problems with emulation.
People forget that the package actually includes an Operating System which needs to be paid for on a per machine basis.
RISC OS isn't yet a free Operating System.
I suppose the confusion comes from the fact you can (illegally of course!) buy a windows OS CD, for instance, and use it accross multiple machines (real or virtual). |
arawnsley
21/4/08 12:51PM |
OS licencing as far as I am aware (at least for Windows):
1) oem copies are for use on 1 machine, and one machine only. They live and die with the machine (real or virtual), and are non-transferrable
2) RISC OS bundled with VRPC is oem and should be considered like Windows-oem
3) Retail copies of Windows cost a LOT more (usually 2-3 times the price, and certainly more than VA costs) but can be transferred from machine to machine.
4) MS are quite fussy about which OSs they allow to be virtualised anyway - it tends to be the expensive ones!
The only thing I'm not sure about is how MS would view a Virtual Machine on a USB stick. I suspect that it would contrevene the oem licence (which probably hasn't been tested in court, of course!) and require a retail OS build.
Select required an OS 4 ROM as a baseline. It can be used on top of any machine with an RO4+ RISCOS Ltd ROM/image, including VRPC.
Using RO4+ ROM images on RPCemu is, I think, pretty much a blatent licence infingement, but hey, this is the RISC OS market - noone can afford to get litigious!!! |
druck
21/4/08 1:18PM |
arawnsley wrote:
"Select required an OS 4 ROM as a baseline. It can be used on top of any machine with an RO4+ RISCOS Ltd ROM/image, including VRPC. "
It doesn't need to on VRPC, you can boot straight in to a suitably prepared Select ROM image. |
cables
21/4/08 1:41PM |
In reply to arawnsley:
"Using RO4+ ROM images on RPCemu is, I think, pretty much a blatent licence infingement,"
Surely that wouldn't apply if the user bought VRPC and used the provided RO4 image with RPCemu instead of using it with VRPC?
Re your point 2: before we had VRPC it was possible to transfer a ROM from a dead machine to a working one. E.g. if an RO4 machine died the owner could transfer the ROM into a working RO3 machine. Does the same not apply to VRPC? |
rjek
21/4/08 2:00PM |
In reply to arawnsley:
Although, under UK law, terms that prevent or limit interoperability are unenforcable. Assuming somebody has obtained RISC OS legally, running it under RPCemu is a grayer area than you might think. |
nijinsky
21/4/08 2:28PM |
IN reply to Arawnsley.
One computer at home.... Came with Windows (bought computer on ebay with genuine license). So I didn't have to buy separately. Work OS (2 computers) came with OS (I work in a Uni and they allow you to put XP on a home machine as part of their agreement (I don't, I have my own license that cam with the machine)) No cost to me. The MacOS machine did come with MacOS (of course) and it is a work machine so they bought the OS. No cost to me.
So the cost of the OS's to me are ZERO.
Surely you don't think someone that uses 5-6 computers actually bought the 6 from their own pocket?
Cheers
Bob |
arawnsley
21/4/08 2:57PM |
Bob, you're not making a lot of sense - even if you didn't pay for all your machines, SOMEONE did. And if you didn't, that's all the more money saved to buy RISC OS licences! And as for your last comment, most of us using multiple machines buy/build them, yes (either directly or through company) - it's called Tax Breaks  |
adamr
21/4/08 4:12PM |
This is good news I hope VA will now be able to devote some development time to fixing some of the problems in the Windows version of VRPC.
Adam |
nijinsky
21/4/08 5:12PM |
Still doesn't affect what comes out of my Pocket. However, One thing I could do is to buy a VARPCSE version at 79GBP and stick my unused VA5000 on a work machine. Then I could slap on my Mpro, datapower, and the Browser (etc) that I got from Rcomp on my new RISCOS home machine. After all it is only a Hobby OS for me these days.
However, I still say that the best IMHO model that VA could have would be to have a One user license.
Cheers
Bob |
hubersn (+1.0)
21/4/08 8:21PM |
In reply to arawnsley:
"Using RO4+ ROM images on RPCemu is, I think, pretty much a blatent licence infingement, but hey, this is the RISC OS market - noone can afford to get litigious!!!"
Using a RISC OS 4 (or RISC OS Adjust or whatever) that was properly bought and is not used in another context is of course perfectly legal on any machine - including RPCemu.
Concerning Windows OEM licences: Microsoft's view of things have been tested in court (at least in Germany), and Microsoft lost. As a result, it is perfectly legal to resell OEM licences, and it is perfectly legal to do whatever the user wants after he has bought it (bundled or unbundled), including running it on a VM. I suspect the same rules also apply to RO4 bundled with V-RPC.
Moral: if you sell something, you can't arbitrarily restrict its usage. |
lym
21/4/08 8:29PM |
In reply to hubersn:
Quite right. However, the hypothetical future scenario of RPCEmu running a suitably modified ROOL R05 would make things rather more simple. I'm hoping Wakefield will see another announcement of released sources - visible progress on this important project is always encouraging. |
rjek
21/4/08 8:32PM |
In reply to hubersn:
The issue here is that Microsoft and ROL aren't selling anything other than a CD: they are providing you a licence to use the software. Of course, if they want to sue their own paying customers, that's their prerogative; but I doubt they'll be customers for long. |
hubersn (+1.0)
21/4/08 9:36PM |
In reply to rjek:
under German law at least, the software is the licence is the "item". Its usage can't be arbitrarily restricted. Resale cannot be denied. The "licence to use" cannot be denied. The kind of hardware it is executed on cannot be defined. The customer has certain rights that no "licence" can take away. This includes e.g. making backups, reverse engineering the software to ensure compatibility and runnability etc. |
stevek
22/4/08 8:11PM |
Regardless of the legal can or cannot's of the licensing I think people need to look at consider that using software without paying for it will discourage developers from producing new software for RISC OS. We can't let that happen.
The market for RISC OS is small and doesn't have the same economies of scale that larger markets have. Developers charge what they think is fair to make a return on the investment of time they make to create these products.
Anyone who can develop a good quality application for RISC OS could almost certainly earn a lot more developing on other platforms and so many of them do this for love of the platform not to become the next Bill Gates.
Please consider these things before breaking the licensing conditions of a RISC OS application. |
hubersn
22/4/08 10:34PM |
In reply to stevek:
I think you misunderstood. The RISC OS 4 ROMs were of course bought and properly paid for. RO Ltd. just think that it is illegal to use it in this specific context, for whatever reasons. They were not able to offer an alternative product they could sell. |
nijinsky
25/4/08 1:39PM |
IN reply to SteveK.
Also consider the people that are not very good at programming. Like Me.
They may wish to programme for a small market like RISC OS and make money, rather than programme for windows and make nothing because there are tons of free apps or better programmers in windows land.
That is why I write apps for a specialist market (microscopy) or for PDA's. Indeed, many of my Palm apps were cracked and you can get them on a .ru site. That was why I eventually stopped writing apps for palm and now do custom jobs.
Anyway moan over.
cheers
Bob |
Charlie
2/7/08 1:57PM |
This is good news - especaily as I'm considering migrating to Macs from doze. My congratulations to the developers on their continuing hard work.
TBH I gave up on VRPC some time ago with issues related to the above comments.
-If its installed on a PC that has regular changes to its setup (network especially) the dreaded invalid licence error pops-up requiring an application to the developers for yet another licence...
...makes the software unusable if your settings are changing on a more than daily basis.
Is this a whinge? I hope not, it's just there are other copy-protection methods & I'd like to be able to use V_RPC.
P.S.
On the subject of licencing there is NO legal impediment for running any OS from a memory stick if that suits the user.
If as is common for home use you have a licence to run one copy on one computer at any one time, what's the difference (apart from convenience) between installing onto transferable media or installing/uninstalling each time you move computer?
But my terms of use state that the licence is tied to a particular computer...
...tricky when PC's can be 'upgraded' endlessly.
|
| Please log in to post a new comment |
RiscPC-hardware emulation software VirtualRiscPC is now officially available for flash Apple Mac computers after spending a year in beta testers' hands. A full release is now shipping after selected brave punters test drove the software and offered their feedback to VRPC publisher VirtualAcorn so that bugs and other issues could be addressed.