| Heard the one about the new spam and privacy law? |
|
Published: 11th Dec 2003, 18:19:07GMT Source: drobe.co.uk
By Chris Williams
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Site announcement |
|
It's not hard to believe that the new UK Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations are derived from an EU directive. Effective from today, the regulations hope to strengthen user privacy and quell spam although at least one trendy web company has revealed that no one cares. As many as 99 percent of UK websites are in fact giving the new law a cold shoulder.
As quoted in a BBC Online report, a WebAbacus spokesperson said, "Companies are either not aware of the legislation, or are ignoring it". The Information Comission is also "surprised".
Speaking to the Beeb, Phil Jones, assistant information commissioner, cried, "There should be transparency. People should know what is going on with the information collected about them. People should recognise that the information collected is only benign - but they should be alerted to the ways that data is going to be used."
Surprised he might be, but he hits the nail on the head as to why webmasters are perhaps reluctant to publish privacy policies. Just about every website that's medium sized or bigger, uses cookies and actively logs and analyses visitor traffic information. Webmasters like to know how many people are reading their content and also what kind of people they are and where they come from, in terms of geography and referers. However, it may drive away visitors - certainly the paranoid ones - when it's revealed exactly how much information is being logged, archived and passed onto third parties. It could simply be that webmasters are oblivious to the new law, or that they don't have the time or the skills to pen a public policy document.
However, now may be the time to get it all out in the open and educate web surfers. You can read more about the new directive from out-law.com and also, information on cookies from aboutcookies.org.
Finally, in accordance with the regulations, we've updated our About page with details on the drobe.co.uk privacy policy. Spend the afternoon writing and editing articles, or drawing up public policies, a tough decision.
Please take a few minutes to read it over and any comments are welcome.
Links
drobe.co.uk privacy policyRelated articles
MW Software is serious about ROUGPS
CJE Micros really want us to know about their wares
RISC OS is about to dock at Port Unix.
This article has been linked to, or is available in the following formats:
|
| |
|
Eddie
11/12/03 7:13PM |
Sounds a bit like my company's mission statement - nobody believes that either! |
ninja
11/12/03 7:39PM |
So in fact this law has almost no real impact on spam seeing as (judging by the sample of 90% of my mail intake which is spam, according to SpamStamp) Britain isn't exactly a hotbed of spamming swines. Still, it's possible that without this law we might become that in the future. |
martin
12/12/03 9:05AM |
One of the good things about accessing the internet and email via a school network (my job) is that pretty much all spam and all advertisements on web pages are removed before it gets to me.
However, it was annoying when Drobe became a banned site and I was reported to the Headmaster for trying to access it !
Just one dodgy work in one news item did it.
(But, one phone call then got it sorted)
Back on topic, this law seems to be universally being criticised as being ineffective and irrelevant.
I guess its a first step in the right direction though. |
Snig (-1.0)
12/12/03 12:47PM |
Why not break more laws then? I don't understand how people boast about breaking the law when most laws are there for their protection. |
Fuzzy
12/12/03 1:21PM |
The main problem is not just the spammers but the idiot minority who respond and buy those "Enlargement tables" etc who then give the spammers an incentive to stay in business. Like most EU directives this is yet another one that will simply be ignored. |
VinceH
12/12/03 6:29PM |
In reply to Ninja:
while this country "isn't exactly
a hotbed of spamming swines" there are
some notably annoying spammers here (ok
- anyone who spams is, by default,
annoying!) and /in theory/ this law
should help stamp them out.
Except it won't - there are loopholes.
One example, which is proving to be a
bone of contention in some circles, is
that it offers little or no protection
for "business" addresses.
Then there is the fact that the Info
Commiss is responsible for dealing with
transgressions and either lacks the
teeth or the resources (or both) to do
so - only time will tell if this
actually true, though.
As things stand, though, while you
suggest that without this law we might
have become a hotbed of spamming swines
in the future, my fear is that we might
become that /because of/ it. 
VinceH |
| 2 comment(s) are below your moderation threshold. Login to view them. | | |
|
|
|
