RISC OS News on Drobe
RISC OS Search
containing
"If the main journalist on a RISC OS news site isn't interested [in ROS news] then things are pretty black."
Welcome back guest  |  Login  |  Register Sunday 20th July 
Login

drobe.co.uk
About Drobe
RISC OS News
Drobe Features
Alternatives
Bookmarks
Riscos.org.uk
Auctions
Events (shows)
AU issues
Tech Material
Wallpaper
Movies
File archives
SH eBooks
FAQs
Changelog

Interact
Forums
Online chat
Your webspace
BBC Emu(games!)
User gallery
RSS news &
comments
Submit news
Contact us

Quick Links
Open directory
Nutshells
ANS archives
ArcSite
RO Repository
Announce
RISCOS Ltd.
Castle

NTK
The Inquirer
The Register
OSNews
Slashdot
Google

Alternatives
NetBSD
ARM Linux
Iyonix Linux

Found Apps
 RISC OS Software !Avalanche
 RISC OS Software !Darts
 RISC OS Software !CFuncAnal
 RISC OS Software !TranTIFF+
 RISC OS Software !Dustbin
 RISC OS Software !NurseW
 RISC OS Software !Tally
 RISC OS Software !VideoLog
 RISC OS Software !USBKick
 RISC OS Software !Spr2Jpeg
Recent users
flibble is a RISC OS User flibble
ritecartdev is a RISC OS User ritecartdev
tduell is a RISC OS User tduell
barti is a RISC OS User barti
bavison is a RISC OS User bavison
jmb is a RISC OS User jmb
rjek is a RISC OS User rjek
Fuzzy is a RISC OS User Fuzzy
chrisj is a RISC OS User chrisj
hubersn is a RISC OS User hubersn


Why donate?

Serving: 15GB
Fuel: caffeine
0 users online
23 guests
177 active accts 24329 comments

Webstats

 
RISC OS News Article
Castle merges with Tematic
Published: 10th Jan 2004, 20:34:22GMT  Source: drobe.co.uk
By Chris Williams
Page 1 of 1
Peter "WildVision" Wild now Chief Operation Officer
Castle and Tematic have sensationally merged into a single entity that aims to focus on "offering full design and engineering resources to customers wishing to licence RISC OS for use in their new products".

Peter Wild, the founder of WildVision who produced many an exceptional podule card, especially for Computer Concepts, is also now the Chief Operation Officer of Castle, bringing with him experience in the electronic design and manufacture of multimedia and desktop technology. Speaking on his new employment, Peter is quoted as saying: "It is great to be back in the RISC OS world. We hope to clinch substantial licence deals with a variety of household names over the coming months. Things have never looked more promising for RISC OS".

Castle managing director Jack Lillingston gushed: "The combination of Tematic's engineering skills and Castle's marketing and product skills means that we have a company structure that can really tackle the opportunities that lie ahead".

Tematic will become the "Tematic Division" under Castle technology, pledging to "support an embedded version of RISC OS which has been designed for use in the new generation of smart multimedia products for the high volume consumer electronics market". How the Tematic division will distract Castle's overall concentration away from RISC OS desktop users will remain to be seen. We hope any development work on the embedded version of RISC OS will filter back to the desktop stream of RISC OS - real time scheduling, increased stability, reduced footprint, increased hardware support, you name your feature.

Is it selfish for us, the RISC OS community, to demand Castle to focus their efforts on the desktop market, as the company desperately forays into the embedded world, with RISC OS as their sword and shield? Is it now make or break for RISC OS, realistically, as an embedded OS suitable for use in "household name" products?

We also wonder where Select will fit into Castle's plans.

You may recall that the XScale powered Iyonix was produced as a result of work by Tematic and Castle. Tematic is also staffed with ex-Pace engineers who were once Acorn engineers - thus the wheel of the Acorn era continues to revolve, with changing names and objectives and yet the same old operating system. You, folks, are the audience.

Links
Castle website
Tematic website

Related articles
Castle reveal shared source licence
Castle and ROS Open reveal plans for 2007
Castle directors patch up 'disagreement'

This article has been linked to, or is available in the following formats:  
 
 
 
 
 
[Printable] [Digg this] [Blog search]


moss(valued user) (-1.5)
Face
10/1/04 8:50PM
Crikey.
john(valued user) (+1.5)
10/1/04 11:57PM
Interesting perhaps that oregano was split away from castle, and RISC OS has been brought in. I get this feeling that they have it all worked out, which can't be bad.

Mind you, I haven't been near anyone who's "gushed" for a while either, which is also nice ;) Good article, I mean!
john(valued user) 
10/1/04 11:59PM
Heh, just read "multi-faceted" - sounds like something from a hair product advert :) I love marketing-speak. Much better than lawyer-speak :)
epistaxsis@work(valued user) (+1.5)
11/1/04 1:25AM
this is very very good.

and also quite ironic - remember that Acorn claimed only to do desktop machines to promote the other (alledgedly more profitable) side of their business?

Hmm iyonix mk2 around the corner then?

truly groovy
vshears 
Face
12/1/04 9:48AM
Yes this is potentially very good news.

This must be the first major announcment of the year that was not even hinted at in Drobes predictions for 2004? :-).

Vic
mrchocky(valued user) 
Face
12/1/04 10:20AM
Drobe.co.uk had known about this, but hadn't been at liberty to discuss it. As such, there may well be other predictions "missed", but we aren't able to discuss those either :-)

In any case, it was a short list. There will be plenty of surprises this year that even the most outrageous guess won't have predicted.
nijinsky(good user) 
12/1/04 10:55AM
Yes like the possibility of a "new simple" cross platform development environment?

Cheers
bob
jmb(good user) 
12/1/04 12:11PM
In reply to nijinsky:

Is the GCCSDK too complex for you then?
The Doctor(good user) 
12/1/04 1:01PM
Pleasant surprises I hope Peter.
Cheers!
nijinsky(good user) (-1.0)
12/1/04 2:30PM
In reply to JMB.

Yes.

The armbase partner programmers are able to do anything, VB, delphi, C C++ JAVA assembler. OS writing etc etc. (they are in texas and mexico at the moment) But I cant. I'm simply an ideas person. I write in RAD's only. Even BASIC is too much hastle to learn. Well for me that is. :-) I'm too busy doing other things. OHHH and BTW. Any surfers out there. AB surfer is due tobe released for the palm.

Cheers
Bob
mrchocky(valued user) 
Face
12/1/04 5:03PM
GCCSDK is reasonably simple to set up. But since you say yourself you aren't a programmer, I'm not really sure what you're getting at.
nijinsky(good user) (-0.1)
12/1/04 7:24PM
Hi Peter

I should have quoted your post snippet "There will be plenty of surprises this year that even the most outrageous guess won't have predicted." That way you would have known to read the post above mine. I thought it was obvious, but hey thats jujst me. Note smiley :-)

Then I replied "Yes like the possibility of a "new simple" cross platform development environment?"
But then you were not in a position to know that.

Then someone asked if GCCSDK was too complex for me and I said yes. It may be reasonably simple to setup and use for computer programmers like you. But then again I'm not interested in learning anything that is not simple for me. That is why I have partners that know how to programme. Just like I dont expect anyone here to know about PSF , deconvolution and confocal laser microscopy and image processing algorithms.

I hope that is clear now. And BTW, the company are probably not interested in a small market, but I'm giving it a try to see if they are interested in the platform.

I can only hope.

Regards
Bob
mrchocky(valued user) (+0.1)
Face
12/1/04 7:34PM
I'm well aware of both the context any meaning of what you did say. But I ask you again, what is your point?

If there's issues with GCCSDK then we'd like to hear about them. If, however, you think that we require a new "simple" cross compile environment, then how do you justify this? Your point currently is that you want something for use by non-programmers, which seems to be something of a contradiction.
john(valued user) 
12/1/04 8:09PM
Maybe soething for non programmers who want to become programmers? I.e. some of that visuaul rubbish you get on windows. Might encourage more programmers, might encourage more bloated and worse programmers. Might encourage me to do some (more) revision for my next exam... :/ However, I'd say it's a waste of effort better spent elsewhere (no, not the revision!)
nijinsky(good user) (-1.1)
12/1/04 8:58PM
OK you did understand what I said but you dont understand the need.

you wrote "If there's issues with GCCSDK then we'd like to hear about them."

OK I read the web site and some of the things about it, and I think it is too dificult to do something quickly, --- for me that is. Not a fault of GCCSDK. JUST ME. It doesn't fit in with my ability, and I speculate it doesn't grip others of my ability. NOTE it is not a fault of the app JUST ME. Also note I dont know the ettiquet for emphasis so I capitalised some words, it is not intended as a shout. :-)

NOW
I did write http://www.gla.ac.uk/~rh82p/confocal.jpg in a day and a half with a 4GL. It searches directories for files and quickly transfers them to the host directory. Ineeded this for work so I wrote it. I could not have done the same in such a short space of time on RISC OS. Fact. Now this sort of thing is the point. RISC OS needs applications. It needs users that see the simplicity of it. It needs a development environment that someone can get it up an running in a couple of days. (don't say basic, even that is too difficult for someone like me). Then when they get to grips with the thing they may progress onwards.

"Your point currently is that you want something for use by non-programmers, which seems to be something of a contradiction."

This is where you miss the point of RAD's and 4GL's. Simple to use but still powerfull. OK as soon as you write one line of code you are a programmer. Good enough for this kind of app on RISC OS in a day? Tell me how?

Have alook at hypercard/supercard. Go to handango (OK for PDA's) and look at the sales of visualCE.

Have a look at as simple and powerfull an implementation of BASIC you can get "realbasic".

All aimed at nonprogrammers, to be simple to get them up to speed VERY quickly. On RISC OS there is wimp basic etc, however, and it is a big however, they do not cross compile on different platforms. (please note this is no slur on wimp basic. It is, I'm lead to beleive, a great programe).

There are easy development apps on riscos, but they are only for RISC OS. To be cross platform you need a more dificult development environment and I found that off-putting.

If you look at the original 2 line post you will see that the above and below is a clarification of "Yes like the possibility of a "new simple" cross platform development environment? "

Unless RISC OS embraces the "can it run on windows" questions it is always going to lose sales of hardware. However, if you could say "it is a doddle for a complete novice to use RISC OS to make apps like the one obove in 2 days and if you want the same on windows, linux or mac you simply click another button and your app is there". And you get a nice OS to do it in. NO GUI etc to build that is different. Just click a button.

Well surely that is a benefit to the platform?

You could always say. Buy this machine for the house and write the apps you need in this riscos language, and you will need to spend a LOT of time learnig it to do so, AND then when you get to work and use MacOS or linux or solaris or windows, you will not be able to run the apps unless you use emulation. OR buy a nice easy to use RISC OS box, write in something like a RAD based on a 4GL like supercard, and then with the click of a button, cross compile for windows, linux, solaris, MacOS, and RISC OS and the front end is written for each platform automatically. :-)

Now you may disagree. And that is your perogative, however, just because you may disagree does not mean the point is not valid for a lot of people.

Appologies to everone elso for the long posting. OFF topic now so I wont continue.

Cheers
Bob
NoMercy 
12/1/04 11:02PM
If anyone had such a tool they'd be rich, though I have to say it'd have to be C/C++ based, <insert VB, 4GL, very rude comment about sub-standard languages> and of course...

Sibelius ran on windows.
nijinsky(good user) 
13/1/04 8:30AM
Hi NoMercy.

It already exists, we are in contact with them, and they might be rich. Sibelius is not a dev environment :-) Also Ovationpro runs on windows as well. -)

Cheers
Bob. Now definately keeping quiet about it.
jonix(good user) 
Face
13/1/04 5:03PM
I can't see a cross platform IDE aimed at "non-programmers" catering for the construction of complex algorithms. This could end up limiting it to only being able to produce desktop clocks, simple search programs and other utilities which already exist in many variants on all the desktop platforms I can think of.
MENTAT(bad user / troll) 
Face
13/1/04 6:59PM
In reply to Jonix:

Re. your first sentence, why not?
jonix(good user) 
Face
15/1/04 11:40PM
What I mean is, if one is inherently a "non-programmer", then one won't know how to create complex algorithms. I can't imagine a tool being able to create one automatically.
nijinsky(good user) (-0.1)
16/1/04 11:53AM
I didn't say thte tool could create algorythms. Nor did I imply that the "non-programmer" should know how to.

Perhaps I should have said routines. like tophat and rolling ball etc.

cheers :-)
bob
jonix(good user) (-0.1)
Face
16/1/04 4:12PM
In reply to Nijinsky:
no, I realise that, but how many iterations of programs can you make that include a tophat and rolling ball (I don't confess to know what those are :) ).
mrchocky(valued user) (-0.1)
Face
16/1/04 4:23PM
The bottom line is that the applications created by non-programmers are ultimately limited to things like hypercard applications, databases, presentations and similar. Any complex behaviour almost always requires programming, no matter how much you go on about off topic discussions.
3 comment(s) are below your moderation threshold. Login to view them.
 

Top Tip


Show your support and appreciation of Drobe launchpad by donating a little money to cover our running costs!
 
Headline news
Wakefield 2008 show photos
28th Apr 2008

Wakefield 2008 show live news
26th Apr 2008

Who would want an A9home PDA?
24th Apr 2008

RISC OS 6.10 available to Select subscribers
24th Apr 2008

Gallery photo
Older news
Animation and typing applications really released
24th Apr 2008

Wakefield 2008 show preview
22nd Apr 2008

R-Comp unveils new PDF authoring package
22nd Apr 2008

NetSurf bags GBP10K investment from Google
21st Apr 2008

Apple Mac VirtualRiscPC leaves beta
20th Apr 2008

Blu-ray disc burn breakthrough
14th Apr 2008

PDF import support for ArtWorks
13th Apr 2008

Wakefield 2008 show theatre line-up revealed
13th Apr 2008

Animation software collection falls into R-Comp's hands
9th Apr 2008

Features
A9home: two years on
4th Dec 2007

A9home DIY laptop: first pictures
1st Dec 2007

Software hosted by Drobe: Your guide
5th Nov 2007

 

Top | Design and concept © Fudgecake Design, 1999 - 2001. Content © The Drobe Team, 1999 - 2008. 
Click here for more information and terms and conditions.