Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Webspace | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Profile for robert79

ContactAbout me
Email:
Private
ICQ:
AOL:
Yahoo:
Username: robert79
Realname: Robert Richards
About me:
Homepage:
Face/Logo:
Comments posted:49 (show all)

Recent comments

On NetSurf halts punter's search for love:

In reply to Druck: As I say it depends what you need your computer for. I wouldn't say it's either RISC OS or the alternatives that are lacking in a general sense. It depends what you want. If you want to write a lot of technical reports with formulae etc then TechWriter on RISC OS is your tool. If you want to do a lot fo clever stuff with spreadsheets and databases then you're probably looking to Windows.

In reply to mrtd: My understanding of industrial control is that critical real time applications are handled by a distributed system. So your user terminal is just a window onto the system that is updated every second or so. The actual control is handled by dedicated Process Managers, with separate modules containing and running applications. That way if your Application Manager goes down the PM's just carry on doing what they were doing or fail in a safe manner depending upon how they have been configured (or cause 500m3/hr of liquid to overflow as happened not so long ago when a program crashed and shut down a filtration station). For example the Honeywell system I am familiar with can sometimes take several seconds to update the screen and this is not really an issue becasue the actual control is being carried out much more quickly by one of a number of dedicated pieces of hardware. (Just as well, 40bar of superheated steam would not be pretty if it wasn't properly controlled!). Likewise, occasionally the universal station will lock up and require a restart, fine as the process is still running quite happily on separate hardware. What I meant was that you could use a RISC OS box as the user interface rather than the actual controller.

 is a RISC OS Userrobert79 on 7/2/07 10:21AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

On NetSurf halts punter's search for love:

I would tend to concur that needing 2 systems means one is lacking in functionality. Or perhaps it is simply lacking in the ability to generate and read file formats from other platforms? There's still nothing on the Windows platform to rival TechWriter, so functionality or lack of is all relative. I've come to the conclusion that RISC OS can now never be a major computing platform for the casual home user. But I still believe it's excellent for people with specific requirements and for which RISC OS software exists to fulfill those requirements.

I've often thought that RISC OS would be suitable for industrial control with some appropriate bespoke software and hardware. Most large installations will use a DCS using proprietary hardware such as Honeywell (if you think RISC OS hardware is expensive, try buying a keyboard from Honeywell...). However some systems such as ABB use software running on a PC platform. Not fun when you lose control of half your plant... For small to medium concerns, RISC OS would be ideal and the sales would generate some revenue to help advance the platform for desktop users and provide useful employment for developers.

Just a pipe dream!

 is a RISC OS Userrobert79 on 6/2/07 7:56PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

On Simtec denies Omega USB involvement:

Either way it's not very good editing.

And one assumes it was deliberate as no protestation of innocence has been made.

 is a RISC OS Userrobert79 on 13/04/04 5:15PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

On Adjust ROMs in production:

Mart: So why do you put up with it? ROL still send me begging letters and I haven't bought anything off them for at least 2 years now!

 is a RISC OS Userrobert79 on 12/04/04 5:56PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

On Simtec denies Omega USB involvement:

In reply to dgs:

That's as may be. My point is that Drobe shouldn't have edited the statement to deliberately change the meaning.

As I keep saying, I am not apologising for MD.

 is a RISC OS Userrobert79 on 12/04/04 3:02PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • Manchester RISC OS Jaunt
    Martin Hansen does Northern dealers
     21 comments, latest by Anon on 3/1/04 9:06PM. Published: 21 Dec 2003

  • Random article

  • RiscCAD bounces back as developer rescues package

     Discuss this. Published: 17 Feb 2001

  • Useful links

    News and media:
    IconbarMyRISCOSArcSiteRISCOScodeANSC.S.A.AnnounceArchiveQercusRiscWorldDrag'n'DropGAG-News

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    Dealers:
    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster

    Usergroups:
    WROCCRONENKACCIRUGSASAUGROUGOLRONWUGMUGWAUGGAGRISCOS.be

    Useful:
    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign


    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "Thanks for the unkind comments. Why are the young such ****s? "
    Page generated in 0.1033 seconds.